Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Vart är Europeiska Unionens försvarspolitik på väg?: En analys av unionens ännu uteblivna gemensamma försvarspolitik och försvar
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2016 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Before this study was conducted, there was a research gap in the current field of

international relations. The purpose of this study was to examine why the EU has not

established a common defence policy and a common defence. In order to address this, a

theoretical framework based on realism and liberalism was created. Taken together, this

study thus filled that gap and provided new insight on EU’s defence policy.

The method that was used to conduct the research was a case study and the material

consisted of the Treaty of Lisbon, EU key documents, as well as numerous of

theoretical works concerning realism and liberalism. The study is of an explaining

nature and the analysis seeks to explain the research question by testing it on the

theoretical framework.

The study concludes that the theoretical framework is able to explain the research

question. Both realism and liberalism contributed with significant insight on why the

EU has not established a common defence policy and a common defence. The main

result shows that realism answers the research question by pointing out the role that

member states play, and that liberalism, in contrast, points at the role EU as a unitary

institution plays.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. , 43 p.
Keyword [en]
EU, Defence Policy, Common Defence, Security, Realism, Liberalism, Soft Power, Hard Power, Rational Choice, Historical Institutionalism
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-49497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-49497DiVA: diva2:899441
Subject / course
Political Science
Educational program
International Social Sciences Programme, specialization Global Studies, 180 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-02-03 Created: 2016-02-01 Last updated: 2016-02-03Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(579 kB)251 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 579 kBChecksum SHA-512
ca87563ead78168aaf47951464855d7ec8c94adc52aeb7e8be0188b16136ffda5e10fc545c92e0bf94e0bb578b7fef4979e48ce38fdc6d2cd6d96ae7bc6be07c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arfvén, Gustav
By organisation
Department of Political Science
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 251 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 1115 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf