Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Barnets bästa i umgänges– och vårdnadstvister: En diskursanalys av svenska domstolars resonemang
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Social Work.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
The best interests of the child in access and custody disputes : A discourse analysis of the Swedish courts and their rendering of the law (English)
Abstract [en]

The aim of this study was to analyse how Swedish courts reason about the child's best in custody and access disputes. We have assumed different themes to analyse our empirical data, these themes were the child's best interests, perspective on the child's best interests, child's perspective, children as subjects or objects and finally the right of the child or the child's best interests. Our empirical data have consisted of 15 City Court and Court of Appeal judgments of the Swedish courts handed down in 2015. The study had a qualitative disposition and the selection was made strategically to make sure the empirical data would be relevant to our issues. We have used a discourse analysis where the intention was to study how the court reason about the child’s interests and what statements that gets preference and what gets excluded in the assessment. Our theoretical starting point was extracted from Foucault’s theory about power and his discourse concept. We have used the concept of his theory in our analysis, but also extracted the theoretical concepts from previous research. The result shows that the Court's assessment of what is in the child’s best interest is based primarily on a professional and adult perspective on the child's situation. The individual child's perspective was excluded and the Court was principally talking about children's needs and interests in general. The result also showed that children were seen as objects and not as participants in the majority of the cases.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
Keyword [en]
The best interests of the child, children’s perspective, access and custody disputes, children´s rights, children as subjects or objects
Keyword [sv]
Barnets bästa, barnperspektiv, umgänges- och vårdnadstvister, barnets rätt, barn som subjekt eller objekt
National Category
Social Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-49185OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-49185DiVA: diva2:896771
Educational program
Social Work Study Programme, 210 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-01-25 Created: 2016-01-22 Last updated: 2016-01-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(616 kB)482 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 616 kBChecksum SHA-512
ef77b60982dcc090bcc0e075a9b0c68902a047abe769817bdf31aab162fead246e26efcc722c6b200dfbaf397a10a830c64f00af9c7b2b86b3593d6c289f2438
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Social Work
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 482 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 936 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf