Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Increasing De-personalization in Warfare: Levinasian Words on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems
Södertörn University, School of Culture and Education.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

What are the implications when robots are pre-programmed to “behave ethically”? What are the implications between the other and me when lethal autonomous weapons systems by themselves target and destroy human beings? In this paper, I address these two inter-related questions through the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas. Firstly (chapter I), I set out to clarify the meaning of “lethal autonomous weapons systems” by discussing concepts such as robot, autonomy, and by outlining the debates regarding these emerging weapons. I also develop my thought on why the philosophy of Levinas is of importance. Secondly (chapter II), I discuss two important Levinasian concepts, namely “substitution” and “thematization”. Finally (chapter III), by using Levinas' concept of substitution, I argue that the issue of making robots “behave ethically”, as some of the on-going debates on LAWS suggest, is missing the deeper question of ethics in the Levinasian sense. LAWS cannot be “ethical” or programmed to “behave ethically”. Ethics is already “there”, before the ethical behaviour, and situated in and constitutive of my very subjectivity as “for-the-other”. In light of this and together with Levinas’ understanding of thematization, I further argue that through the very conception of lethal autonomous weapons systems the ethical encounter becomes a denial, implying violence and a problematic dehumanization already at work, both towards the "I" and the other. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 39 p.
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-29216OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-29216DiVA: diva2:895468
Subject / course
Philosophy
Uppsok
Humanities, Theology
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2016-01-19 Created: 2016-01-19 Last updated: 2016-01-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(516 kB)86 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 516 kBChecksum SHA-512
fded9577e05c5aaa9ef464ede64bf713fefb3cfad8bf68de4f1ac91fef28115f40d77af5e0eb4ecf3049a8208f00c2f25a317954b6350ea807eaa21e5d4819b4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Culture and Education
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 86 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 277 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf