Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The heterogeneous landscape of bibliometric indicators: Evaluating models for allocating resources at Swedish universities
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5196-7148
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7375-0855
Lund University Library.
2016 (English)In: Research Evaluation, ISSN 0958-2029, E-ISSN 1471-5449, 1-16 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The use of bibliometric indicators on individual and national levels has gathered considerable interest in recent years, but the application of bibliometric models for allocating resources at the institutional level has so far gathered less attention. This article studies the implementation of bibliometric measures for allocating resources at Swedish universities. Several models and indicators based on publications, citations, and research grants are identified. The design of performance-based resource allocation across major universities is then analysed using a framework from the field of evaluation studies. The practical implementation, the incentives as well as the ‘ethics’ of models and indicators, are scrutinized in order to provide a theoretically informed assessment of evaluation systems. It is evident that the requirements, goals, possible consequences, and the costs of evaluation are scarcely discussed before these systems are implemented. We find that allocation models are implemented in response to a general trend of assessment across all types of activities and organizations, but the actual design of evaluation systems is dependent on size, orientation, and the overall organization of the institution in question.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016. 1-16 p.
Keyword [en]
research evaluation, performance indicators, university governance, bibliometrics, Sweden
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-8437DOI: 10.1093/reseval/rvv040OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-8437DiVA: diva2:893309
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2016-01-12 Created: 2016-01-12 Last updated: 2017-10-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(330 kB)182 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 330 kBChecksum SHA-512
709645c30e1d976d1c248399eeda0b1ee49a2fbf804a2b923d55afbb3c5b589bdd390b77d1192e1b65ad318782845a20e53f6169ace29095869c0bee02557cf0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Björn, HammarfeltNelhans, GustafEklund, Pieta
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
In the same journal
Research Evaluation
Information Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 182 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1800 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf