Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Additive Manufacturing Technology Potential: A Cleaner Manufacturing Alternative
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Mechanical Engineering. (Product Development Research Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9662-4576
2016 (English)In: INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2015, VOL 4, AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS , 2016, Vol. 4Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This paper focuses on an emerging manufacturing technology called Additive Manufacturing (AM) and its potential to become a more efficient and cleaner manufacturing alternative. This work is built around selected case companies, where the benefit of AM compared to other more traditional technologies is studied through the comparison of resource consumption. The resource consumption is defined as raw materials and energy input. The scope of this work is the application of AM in the scale model kit industry. The method used is the life cycle inventory study, which is a subtype of life cycle assessment (LCA). The result of the paper is the quantification of raw materials and energy consumption. The outcomes shows that AM has higher efficiency in terms of materials usage, as a higher proportion of materials ending up in the final product. Injection Molding (IM), on the other hand, wastes a significant proportion of raw materials in components that are not part of the final product. If the same or similar raw materials are used in both manufacturing methods, the advantage is clearly with AM. However, AM has higher energy consumption in comparison to the injection molding technique (IM). In terms of energy consumption, AM only has an advantage in this area when working with a very low production volume. The analysis of the energy consumption shows that most of the energy used in AM is to create the final product, while IM only uses a fraction of the total energy to produce the final product. AM technologies are still very new but have the potential for development and reduction of energy consumption in the future. Added to this potential is the higher materials usage efficiency of AM, which reduce the waste of materials and the energy, embedded in them. These two factors are likely to position AM as cleaner manufacturing alternative.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER SOC MECHANICAL ENGINEERS , 2016. Vol. 4
Keyword [en]
additive manufacturing 3d printing
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-11332ISI: 000379884000001ISBN: 978-0-7918-5711-3 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-11332DiVA: diva2:889426
Conference
ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, Boston, Masssachusetts, USA.
Funder
Knowledge Foundation
Available from: 2015-12-25 Created: 2015-12-25 Last updated: 2017-03-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1203 kB)