Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa?: An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Human Geography.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This Master thesis is written in the field of collaborative planning aiming to challenge the collaborative approach on it applicability, especially in the context of the Global South. As a case study it looks on the urban poor community participatory practice, the so called 're-blocking' in Cape Town – an example of insitu informal settlement upgrading. It questions not only to what extent re-blocking displays a successful approach of collaborative planing but also whether it can lead to more inclusive cities in South Africa. The field data was gained through qualitative semi-structured interviews, observations and an analysis of national housing policy documents. The findings evaluate re-blocking as a successful example of collaborative planning in the sense that local communities are truly involved in the process and have a lot of decision making power. Also, re- blocking can be replicable to other cities in South Africa. Yet it faces several risks in community mobilisation and communication and can only be operated on a small scale. Therefore, the thesis concludes that re-blocking itself may not lead to inclusive cities, however as an example of community participation it may change the mindset of the South African society and (local) government towards informal community inclusion. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 84 p.
Keyword [en]
re-blocking, collaborative planning, insitu informal settlement upgrading, urban poor communities, inclusive cities, South Africa, SDI, Upgrading Informal Settlements Programme (UISP)
National Category
Human Geography
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-124485OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-124485DiVA: diva2:889312
Available from: 2016-01-13 Created: 2015-12-23 Last updated: 2016-01-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(28626 kB)233 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 28626 kBChecksum SHA-512
ccdcc22fee3cf8107a86f1bb2bee16c0581e72c0e038e17b099c3747fda07553c2705e93dcc50bed6fb29f7819f7fa2ef1569584859112cbea20e29a7b88052b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Human Geography
Human Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 233 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 236 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf