Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Should schools expect poor physical and mental health, social adjustment, and participation outcomes in students with disability?
Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication, HLK, CHILD. Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Curtin University, Perth, WA, Australia.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 10, no 5, 1-23 p., e0126630Article in journal (Refereed) PublishedText
Abstract [en]

The literature on whether students with disabilities have worse physical and mental health, social adjustment, and participation outcomes when compared to their peers without disabilities is largely inconclusive. While the majority of case control studies showed significantly worse outcomes for students with disabilities; the proportion of variance accounted for is rarely reported. The current study used a population cross-sectional approach to determine the classification ability of commonly used screening and outcome measures in determining the disability status. Furthermore, the study aimed to identify the variables, if any, that best predicted the presence of disability. Results of univariate discriminant function analyses suggest that across the board, the sensitivity of the outcome/screening tools to correctly identify students with a disability was 31.9% higher than the related Positive Predictive Value (PPV). The lower PPV and Positive Likelihood Ratio (LR+) scores suggest that the included measures had limited discriminant ability (17.6% to 40.3%) in accurately identifying students at-risk for further assessment. Results of multivariate analyses suggested that poor health and hyperactivity increased the odds of having a disability about two to three times, while poor close perceived friendship and academic competences predicted disability with roughly the same magnitude. Overall, the findings of the current study highlight the need for researchers and clinicians to familiarize themselves with the psychometric properties of measures, and be cautious in matching the function of the measures with their research and clinical needs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 5, 1-23 p., e0126630
National Category
Social Work
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-28726DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126630ISI: 000354543500071PubMedID: 25965845ScopusID: 2-s2.0-84930629553Local ID: HLKCHILDISOAI: diva2:888121
Available from: 2015-12-22 Created: 2015-12-22 Last updated: 2015-12-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(375 kB)38 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 375 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Falkmer, Torbjörn
By organisation
In the same journal
Social Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 38 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 104 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link