Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Using the CEFR to organise teaching and assessment in teacher training
University of Borås, School of Education and Behavioural Science.
2010 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The Common European Framework of References for Languages Framework, along with the European Language Portfolio are used increasingly today in all levels of foreign language learning. Research has shown them to have positive effects on language learning. Despite this they have only had a limited use at university level. This paper describes problems involved in trying to use the Framework descriptors as the starting point for organising teaching and assessing teacher trainer students’ language proficiency and suggests that resistance to its use are because of the characteristics of the local learning culture. The results in this paper suggest that the introduction of the Framework descriptors has only had a limited influence on teacher practice. Whilst the learner outcomes connected to the Framework have made more explicit the expectations put on students, traditional views amongst teachers about teaching,learning and assessment mean that there has only been a limited influence on reporting student progress and in making decisions about teaching. These views and practices are closely related to what Bernstein has described as the dominant curriculum model in universities, the disciplinary model; characterized by vertical pedagogic relations between teachers and students, with the rules of selection of curriculum content and of evaluation residing in the hands of the teachers. The transmitter (the teacher) has explicit control and education implies a strong emphasis on students’ acquisitions of theoretical knowledge.These charcteristics are in contrast to the ideas behind the Framework, which are closer to Bernstein’s other curriculum model the vocational model, which emphasises the development of specific skills relevant for specific situations and the ability to combine concepts and skills in practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010.
Keyword [en]
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-6386Local ID: 2320/6677OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-6386DiVA: diva2:887074
Conference
11th International CercleS Conference Helsinki
Available from: 2015-12-22 Created: 2015-12-22

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(130 kB)180 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 130 kBChecksum SHA-512
916efccfab43307e5c48592e5fce04b626cf6fead1992cd2c69b7e5c3415a8ebdb2d2443781cd93ba9dff70da4b3de6202bdf3c85fc5168a2742d9d69755de68
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Baldwin, Richard
By organisation
School of Education and Behavioural Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 180 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 131 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf