Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Engineering 2.0 - Exploring lightweight technologies for the virtual enterprise
Luleå Technical University. (Product Development Research Lab)
Luleå Technical University. (Product Development Research Lab)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9662-4576
Show others and affiliations
2010 (English)In: From CSCW to Web 2.0: European Developments in Collaborative Design, Springer , 2010, 173-191 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In a traditional business partnership, the partner companies are under contractual obligation to share data, information, and knowledge through one or several information systems that the leading firm decides. In such a case, the issue of sharing "whatever needs to be shared" is settled in contracts before any action is taken, however, also giving the implications that sharing expertise becomes a heavy and time-consuming activity. In turn, it can be argued that the heavy administration affects the lead time of product development negatively since the necessary input flows are delayed. In addition, the adaptation to certain predefined collaborative information systems is both expensive and resource-consuming (e.g., educating staff to use them). Also, the system might not be adaptable to the existing internal technology structure, causing a "translation" procedure, again taking up resources. Another structure for collaboration is a network or alliance of independent partner companies. One motivation for a network structure is that the partners can join or leave it more easily. A reason for joining and staying is an implicit sense of knowledge sharing (Tomkins 2001) and access to a "win-win" environment. Furthermore, the partners can be linked by information technology, i.e., forming a virtual ­structure rather than a physical one. The technologies provide the channels with additional knowledge. In a best-case scenario, a company would get access to a wide range of useful competences, and in a worst-case scenario the company would be drained of its core competences. Accordingly, at least two considerations for joining a partner network can be considered. First, the resources needed to couple the technologies have to be reasonable, due to the underpinning logic of going in and out of more than one network. Second, the company has to identify its knowledge base and evaluate the prospective gains and losses of sharing its expertise.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2010. 173-191 p.
Keyword [en]
Computer science, Other information technology, engineering 2.0, web 2.0
National Category
Other Mechanical Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-11253DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84882-965-7_9ISBN: 978-1-84882-964-0OAI: diva2:885836


Available from: 2015-12-21 Created: 2015-12-18 Last updated: 2016-01-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1071 kB)39 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1071 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Larsson, AndreasLarsson, TobiasBertoni, Marco
By organisation
Department of Mechanical Engineering
Other Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 39 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 81 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link