Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Why ‘design research practice’ is not design as we know it
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå Institute of Design.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå Institute of Design. Indiana University, Bloomington.
2014 (English)In: Proceedings of DRS 2014: Design's Big Debates / [ed] Lim, Y.-K., Niedderer, K., Redström, J., Stolterman, E., & Valtonen, A., Umeå: Umeå University , 2014, 1039-1048 p.Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Is there a difference between design practice and design research practice? Building on recent discussions within design research about whether the design practice which occurs within design research is distinct and separate from the design practice which occurs within the design profession, this paper presents a case where constructive design practice was employed within a research project, using this example to study the nature of the design process in research. Through a thorough analysis of the designs generated, the motivations behind their development, their use as research tools, and the knowledge they generated, we identified three ways in which the design process was altered when it was imported into the research. First, the degree of development of the designs shifted from fully functional to functional enough. Second, the designs were developed in order to ask questions rather than trying to solve a problem. And finally, the failure of the design was equally able to contribute to generating knowledge as its success. We argue that these shifts in values clearly distinguish design research practice from professional design practice, but come with very real consequences that challenge the core measures we use to assess design.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University , 2014. 1039-1048 p.
Keyword [en]
Research through Design, Design Practice, Design Research Practice
National Category
Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-113501ISBN: 978-91-7601-068-6 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-113501DiVA: diva2:885710
Conference
Design Research Society
Available from: 2015-12-20 Created: 2015-12-20 Last updated: 2016-02-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(360 kB)57 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 360 kBChecksum SHA-512
e5b0aad339aafa7fcf3bbfb38d781f1eea4547af7708ff989066c63e421abb7bdcc66265ae3deed3fe00f993ca126997752624ed187249ddb87e74a876155ba2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

URL

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mullaney, Tara
By organisation
Umeå Institute of DesignUmeå Institute of Design
Design

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 57 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 157 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf