Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
living on; not getting better
Linköping University, The Tema Institute, The Department of Gender Studies. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences. York University, Canada.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-9360-0931
2015 (English)In: Feminist review (Print), ISSN 0141-7789, E-ISSN 1466-4380, no 111, 10-24 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The contemporary emergence of the concept debility, which pertains to a broad swathe of humanity whose ordinary lives simply persist without ever getting better, shares a time span with an acute critique of neo-liberal biopolitics. Where capital has historically relied on a population that through its labour necessarily becomes debilitated, the newer model of understanding references the intrinsic profitability of debility itself. The two dimensions overlap and co-exist, but what I shall pursue here are the implications of recognising that, at the most fundamental level, it is in the interests of neo-liberalism to produce and sustain bodies as debilitated and therefore susceptible to a range of market commodities that hold out the promise of therapeutic interventions into the relative failures of physical, cognitive and affective embodiment. In previous work, I have argued strongly for the inherent vulnerability of all bodies, but in considering here a more overtly politicised context, it becomes possible to readdress the questions posed by Jasbir Puar: which bodies are made to pay for "progress"? Which debilitated bodies can be reinvigorated for neoliberalism, and which cannot? And at the present moment, writing at a time of imposed austerity, I would add, what, if anything, is lost in the deployment of the term debility instead of disability?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
PALGRAVE MACMILLAN LTD , 2015. no 111, 10-24 p.
Keyword [en]
debility; neo-liberalism; biopolitics
National Category
Gender Studies Social Work
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-123145DOI: 10.1057/fr.2015.22ISI: 000364728300002OAI: diva2:877636
Available from: 2015-12-07 Created: 2015-12-04 Last updated: 2016-11-01

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(172 kB)12 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 172 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shildrick, Margrit
By organisation
The Department of Gender StudiesFaculty of Arts and Sciences
In the same journal
Feminist review (Print)
Gender StudiesSocial Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 12 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 111 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link