Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Indigenous research across continents: a comparison of ethically and culturally sound approaches to research in Australia and Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Sami Research. Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of culture and media studies. (Arcum)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4853-9641
University of South Australia.
2015 (English)In: Finding common ground: narratives, provocations and reflections from the 40 year celebration of batchelor institute / [ed] Henk Huijser, Robyn Ober, Sandy O’Sullivan, Eva McRae-Williams, Ruth Elvin, Batchelor NT: Batchelor Press , 2015, 119-126 p.Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In the context of opposition to, or absence of, ethical engagement in Indigenous research, researchers aremorally obligated to make a stand that ensures their engagement strategy and implementation plan uses an approach based on positionality, participation, mutual respect, and partnership. Whilst this may involve new challenges for the researcher, such an initiative maximises the likelihood of an empowering and culturally safe process for vulnerable participants, including inexperienced researchers. As two early career researchers, we reflect on our experiences amidst some of the challenges within Indigenous research. These challenges include ethical, methodological and structural issues. The main aims of this chapter are to advocate for practical and philosophical reform of Indigenous research ethics particularly in the context of decolonisation; ultimately to maximise the benefits of research primarily for community research participants, service providers, and policy makers as opposed to primarily for the academy. The authors' experiential and theoretical knowledge enables a critical understanding of the philosophical underpinnings of a decolonising research approach and how this guides the development of an appropriate ethics protocol. We acknowledge that research impacts on Indigenous peoples' lives, often in a negative or unintended manner, and its governance varies dramatically according to individual as well as institutional values that are steeped in Western thought including colonialism. This paper draws on scholarly theoretical knowledge of cultural protocols and the governance of ethical processes from international and local sources, as well as our own experiences in cross-cultural communication to articulate what we call a Decolonising Standpoint. We regard this as a necessary addition to the implementation of an Indigenous Standpoint in the context of research, which has provided a highly credible philosophy and practice for Indigenous researchers. We aim to create an additional and quite distinct position that non-Indigenous researchers can add to their repertoire of skills and knowledge in the context of Indigenous research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Batchelor NT: Batchelor Press , 2015. 119-126 p.
National Category
Cultural Studies Ethnology
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-112307ISBN: 987-1-74131-309-3ISBN: 978-1-74131-310-9OAI: diva2:876758
Available from: 2015-12-04 Created: 2015-12-04 Last updated: 2016-05-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(307 kB)154 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 307 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sehlin MacNeil, Kristina
By organisation
Centre for Sami ResearchDepartment of culture and media studies
Cultural StudiesEthnology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 154 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 182 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link