Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
A Discussion of the Debates Underpinning Agri-Environmental Schemes as a form of Payment for Ecological Services
Södertörn University, School of Natural Sciences, Technology and Environmental Studies, Environmental Science.
2015 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Payments for Ecological Services (PES) has rapidly emerged around the world as a key environmental governance approach. This paper is concerned with Agricultural Environmental Schemes (AES) as a particular form of PES to improve the environmental performance of agriculture particularly in relation to water quality in Sweden. Win-win descriptions prevail in AES policy discourse to describe the simultaneous achievement of environmental goals and economic outcomes for farmers. AES are underpinned by an instrumental assumption that farmer behaviour can be influenced towards adopting better environmental practice by providing monetary incentives (or at least compensation). This paper has touched on a number of contentions in the PES literature, including: doubts about how well standardised PES schemes link with local conditions; how and whether PES schemes can engender local innovation; procedural and distributive equity concerns; claims that monetary incentives may ‘crowd out’ socially derived sources of motivation (local norms); and doubts about whether PES schemes, disembedded from local institutions, can deliver ‘sufficient’ environmental behavioural change. Given the relatively recent emergence of AES schemes, it is important that we learn more from the experience of implementation. Critically oriented empirically-based research then has the capacity to work as a circuit breaker between ideologically driven arguments that side either for or against the use of market mechanisms, such as AES for environmental governance. Such insights may be useful to help focus research on farmer engagement with AES that subjects it to greater empirical scrutiny and validation.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Huddinge: Södertörns högskola , 2015. , 21 p.
Series
Working Paper, ISSN 1404-1480 ; 2015:5
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Research subject
Environmental Studies; Baltic and East European studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-28816Local ID: 512/42/2012OAI: oai:DiVA.org:sh-28816DiVA: diva2:876436
Projects
Cooperating for sustainable regional marine governance
Funder
The Foundation for Baltic and East European Studies, 512/42/2012
Available from: 2015-12-03 Created: 2015-12-03 Last updated: 2016-02-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

A Discussion of the Debates Underpinning Agri-Environmental Schemes as a form of Payment for Ecological Services(227 kB)323 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 227 kBChecksum SHA-512
b9f4707c2c4910f99c6e00e7a7d4d1336dd18bb5f62944de3385f57cb3921fe7987fa628aa7526f1ee1bb8fa83f1841eaf6acebbfce497ccc2c6660b29bd5494
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Saunders, Fred P.
By organisation
Environmental Science
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 323 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 431 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf