Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Depicting the interplay between organisational tiers in the use of a national quality registry to develop quality of care in Sweden
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing. Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7737-169X
Uppsala universitet.
Uppsala universitet.
Uppsala universitet.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMC Health Services Research, ISSN 1472-6963, E-ISSN 1472-6963, Vol. 15, no 1, 519Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: With a pending need to identify potential means to improved quality of care, national quality registries (NQRs) are identified as a promising route. Yet, there is limited evidence with regards to what hinders and facilitates the NQR innovation, what signifies the contexts in which NQRs are applied and drive quality improvement. Supposedly, barriers and facilitators to NQR-driven quality improvement may be found in the healthcare context, in the politico-administrative context, as well as with an NQR itself. In this study, we investigated the potential variation with regards to if and how an NQR was applied by decision-makers and users in regions and clinical settings. The aim was to depict the interplay between the clinical and the politico-administrative tiers in the use of NQRs to develop quality of care, examining an established registry on stroke care as a case study.

METHODS: We interviewed 44 individuals representing the clinical and the politico-administrative settings of 4 out of 21 regions strategically chosen for including stroke units representing a variety of outcomes in the NQR on stroke (Riksstroke) and a variety of settings. The transcribed interviews were analysed by applying The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

RESULTS: In two regions, decision-makers and/or administrators had initiated healthcare process projects for stroke, engaging the health professionals in the local stroke units who contributed with, for example, local data from Riksstroke. The Riksstroke data was used for identifying improvement issues, for setting goals, and asserting that the stroke units achieved an equivalent standard of care and a certain level of quality of stroke care. Meanwhile, one region had more recently initiated such a project and the fourth region had no similar collaboration across tiers. Apart from these projects, there was limited joint communication across tiers and none that included all individuals and functions engaged in quality improvement with regards to stroke care.

CONCLUSIONS: If NQRs are to provide for quality improvement and learning opportunities, advances must be made in the links between the structures and processes across all organisational tiers, including decision-makers, administrators and health professionals engaged in a particular healthcare process.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 15, no 1, 519
Keyword [en]
clinical database, national quality registry, implementation, quality improvement, medical registry
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-20323DOI: 10.1186/s12913-015-1188-2ISI: 000365402700001PubMedID: 26607344OAI: diva2:875424
Available from: 2015-12-01 Created: 2015-12-01 Last updated: 2016-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1812 kB)25 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1812 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann CatrineWallin, Lars
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
BMC Health Services Research
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 25 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 284 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link