Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Assessment of PaO2/FiO(2) for stratification of patients with moderate and severe acute respiratory distress syndrome
Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp, Madrid, Spain.;Hosp Univ Dr Negrin, Res Unit, Multidisciplinary Organ Dysfunct Evaluat Res Netw, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain..
Inst Salud Carlos III, CIBER Enfermedades Resp, Madrid, Spain.;Hosp Univ Rio Hortega, Intens Care Unit, Valladolid, Spain..
Hosp Gen Ciudad Real, Intens Care Unit, Ciudad Real, Spain..
Univ Valladolid, Hosp Clin, Intens Care Unit, Valladolid, Spain..
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMJ Open, ISSN 2044-6055, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 5, no 3, e006812Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: A recent update of the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) proposed an empirical classification based on ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen to fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO(2)) at ARDS onset. Since the proposal did not mandate PaO2/FiO(2) calculation under standardised ventilator settings (SVS), we hypothesised that a stratification based on baseline PaO2/FiO(2) would not provide accurate assessment of lung injury severity. Design: A prospective, multicentre, observational study. Setting: A network of teaching hospitals. Participants: 478 patients with eligible criteria for moderate (100<PaO2/FiO(2)<= 200) and severe (PaO2/FiO(2)<= 100) ARDS and followed until hospital discharge. Interventions: We examined physiological and ventilator parameters in association with the PaO2/FiO(2) at ARDS onset, after 24 h of usual care and at 24 h under a SVS. At 24 h, patients were reclassified as severe, moderate, mild (200<PaO2/FiO(2)<= 300) ARDS and non-ARDS (PaO2/FiO(2)>300). Primary and secondary outcomes: Group severity and hospital mortality. Results: At ARDS onset, 173 patients had a PaO2/FiO(2)<= 100 but only 38.7% met criteria for severe ARDS at 24 h under SVS. When assessed under SVS, 61.3% of patients with severe ARDS were reclassified as moderate, mild and non-ARDS, while lung severity and hospital mortality changed markedly with every PaO2/FiO(2) category (p<0.000001). Our model of risk stratification outperformed the stratification using baseline PaO2/FiO(2) and non-standardised PaO2/FiO(2) at 24 h, when analysed by the predictive receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve: area under the ROC curve for stratification at baseline was 0.583 (95% CI 0.525 to 0.636), 0.605 (95% CI 0.552 to 0.658) at 24 h without SVS and 0.693 (95% CI 0.645 to 0.742) at 24 h under SVS (p<0.000001). Conclusions: Our findings support the need for patient assessment under SVS at 24 h after ARDS onset to assess disease severity, and have implications for the diagnosis and management of ARDS patients.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 5, no 3, e006812
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-267586DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006812ISI: 000363458200056PubMedID: 25818272OAI: diva2:873716
Available from: 2015-11-24 Created: 2015-11-24 Last updated: 2015-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(789 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 789 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Suarez-Sipmann, Fernando
By organisation
Hedenstierna laboratory
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 21 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 127 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link