Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Livscykelanalys av marksaneringsåtgärder: Åtgärdsvalstudie för Norrbyskär - vilket alternativ innebär minst klimatbelastning?
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Life cycle assessment of soil remediation options:Study of options at Norrbyskär - which alternative has the least climate impact? 

The purpose of this report was to make a life cycle assessment (LCA) to compare four suggested options for soil remediation at Norrbyskär, Umeå. The question formulation was to find out which option that had the least climate impact depending on the aim of the remediation. Main focus of the study was emissions of CO2 from transportation and machine work for each remediation option. The LCA was a screening and presented a good overview for the results. What sets the four remediation options apart is the amount of soil that is processed for each option. The LCA was performed according to the standards ISO 14040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006. Calculations in the report was performed with the LCA-software SimaPro and general data from EcoInvent. The results showed that the total emissions from each soil remediation option varied between 310 and 590 tonnes carbon dioxide equivalents (CO2e). The option that only included covering of the contaminated area with new soil had the least emissions and the option that included excavation and filling with new soil had the highest emissions. Both options do not fulfill the same goals in the end, though. One conclusion is that the more extensive remediation is the greater is the climate impact. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 17 p.
Keyword [en]
life cycle assessment (LCA), soil remediation options, emissions, carbon dioxide equivalents, climate impact
National Category
Natural Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-111234OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-111234DiVA: diva2:868481
External cooperation
Tyréns AB
Subject / course
Examensarbete i miljö och hälsoskydd
Educational program
Bachelor of Science in Environmental Health
Available from: 2015-11-13 Created: 2015-11-10 Last updated: 2015-11-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(807 kB)265 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 807 kBChecksum SHA-512
9c642d73f0238e83fbd2b02a160b38ca343bf4ab124d9eb5a85f79381371e9d74a169ab97950e2b2722cc708d274ef604a8ed92953f07b49c909462072fc8e9d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
Natural Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 265 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 479 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf