Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Managing uncertainty: forest professionals’ claim and epistemic authority in the face of societal and climate change
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. (Environmental Sociology Section)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6735-0011
Örebro University, School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences. (Environmental Sociology Section)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3679-3140
2015 (English)In: Risk Management: An International Journal, ISSN 1460-3799, E-ISSN 1743-4637, Vol. 17, no 3, 145-164 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

How do professional experts develop advice in the face of uncertainty? The background for this question is that uncertainties threaten all forms of expertise because they risk calling the professional claim into question and undermine the professional’s epistemic authority. Adopting a multidimensional concept of uncertainty as its point of departure, this paper focuses on how a specific category of experts – forest professionals – encounter and cope with uncertainty in their counselling activities, particularly uncertainty related to climate change. The empirical material consists of an interview study of publicly employed forest consultants in Sweden. The analysis identifies seven strategies that are applied to cope with uncertainties. The findings indicate that a multidimensional concept of uncertainty can explain why cognitive uncertainty is more easily managed than other types of uncertainty. Moreover, uncertainty may not be a central obstacle to offering advice; rather it can be actively used to gain authority and influence action.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London, United Kingdom: Palgrave Macmillan, 2015. Vol. 17, no 3, 145-164 p.
Keyword [en]
Expertise, epistemic authority, professional claim, uncertainty, forestry
National Category
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-46430DOI: 10.1057/rm.2015.10ISI: 000364257500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-84946088655OAI: oai:DiVA.org:oru-46430DiVA: diva2:867890
Funder
Mistra - The Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research
Note

Funding Agencies:

Forestry Research Institute of Sweden (Skogforsk)

Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)

Umeå University

Available from: 2015-11-07 Created: 2015-11-07 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(229 kB)132 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 229 kBChecksum SHA-512
15eb1c2e1b006afaf4c619d5e707b235a8856b4234157c9e1b28317774c8464659b9b59a806348fb5c7d50ed22f4b1128676b9df75e159c4fc70a2f97321c645
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lidskog, RolfLöfmarck, Erik
By organisation
School of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences
In the same journal
Risk Management: An International Journal
Sociology (excluding Social Work, Social Psychology and Social Anthropology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 132 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 374 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf