Homonymy of genera
2015 (English)In: Australasian Systematic Botany Society Newsletter, ISSN 2204-910X, no 162-163, 8-11 p.Article, review/survey (Other (popular science, discussion, etc.)) Published
Philip Short recently faced the problem of having established a plant genus that turned out to be a homonym of an earliernamed genus. In 2014, he erected the name Roebuckia for a range of daisy species in his review of Brachyscome. However, Roebuckia had already been established as a name for a fossil (Early Cretaceous) plant from Western Australia by myself (McLoughlin, 1996). Because homonyms are illegitimate according to the International Code of Nomenclature for Algae, Fungi and Plants (McNeill et al., 2012), Philip was obliged to establish a new name (Roebuckiella) for those species he had previously assigned to Roebuckia (see Short, 2015). How, then, can one be sure that when establishing a new genus, the chosen name has not been used before?
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Adelaide: Australasian Systematic Botany Society , 2015. no 162-163, 8-11 p.
Taxonomy, Plant systematics, Nomenclature, Homonyms, Species, Genera
Other Earth and Related Environmental Sciences
Research subject Diversity of life; Ecosystems and species history
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:nrm:diva-1351OAI: oai:DiVA.org:nrm-1351DiVA: diva2:862091
ProjectsExceptional permineralized biotas - windows into the evolution and functional diversity of terrestrial ecosystems through time
FunderSwedish Research Council, VR 2014-5234