Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sambedömning för ökad likvärdighet?
Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Naturvetenskap.
Kristianstad University, Research environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA). Kristianstad University, School of Education and Environment, Avdelningen för Naturvetenskap. (LISMA)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3251-6082
2015 (Swedish)In: Educare - Vetenskapliga skrifter, ISSN 1653-1868, no 2, 179-205 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Teachers’ assessment and grading of student achievement is often charged for not being reliable. Various suggestions of how to reach higher levels of reliability are advocated in different contexts, and one suggestion is “social moderation”. Social moderation involves teachers working together when assessing and grading student performance. Although the claim is often made that moderation practices lead to higher levels of reliability in teachers’ assessment and grading, such claims often lack scientific support. In this study, a literature review has been carried out in order to gain knowledge about the potential effects that moderation may have and whether these effects may in fact lead to more reliable assessment and grading. The results indicate that moderation practices do have an effect, which may ultimately lead to higher levels of reliability if these practices involve several levels in the assessment process. Moderation is also a process that can be affected by several factors, such as the organization of the moderation meetings and the selection of student performance.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö: Malmö högskola , 2015. no 2, 179-205 p.
Keyword [en]
grading, moderation, reliability, teacher assessment
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-14924OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hkr-14924DiVA: diva2:860260
Available from: 2015-10-12 Created: 2015-10-12 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(349 kB)300 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 349 kBChecksum SHA-512
0f2373bef2901dc28150df145162c5a210a6c4ba934d91e22bc33bc38ff12b510d133f8c9e4b161931935a49565606035ec498a7c009c70c0cd3688649f5d6b3
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Fulltext

Authority records BETA

Thornberg, PiaJönsson, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Thornberg, PiaJönsson, Anders
By organisation
Avdelningen för NaturvetenskapResearch environment Learning in Science and Mathematics (LISMA)
In the same journal
Educare - Vetenskapliga skrifter
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 300 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 720 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf