Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling for single cell estimation: when, why, and how to use it
Linkoping Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden..
Linkoping Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, SE-58185 Linkoping, Sweden.;Linkoping Univ, Dept Clin & Expt Med, SE-58185 Uppsala, Sweden.;AstraZeneca, Modeling & Simulat, Molndal, Sweden.;Fraunhofer Chalmers Ctr, Dept Syst & Data Anal, SE-41288 Gothenburg, Sweden..
Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Fisiol Biol Mol & Neurociencias, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.;Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina..
Univ Buenos Aires, Inst Fisiol Biol Mol & Neurociencias, Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina.;Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Ciencias Exactas & Nat, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina..
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMC Systems Biology, ISSN 1752-0509, E-ISSN 1752-0509, Vol. 9, 52Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Studies of cell-to-cell variation have in recent years grown in interest, due to improved bioanalytical techniques which facilitates determination of small changes with high uncertainty. Like much high-quality data, single-cell data is best analysed using a systems biology approach. The most common systems biology approach to single-cell data is the standard two-stage (STS) approach. In STS, data from each cell is analysed in a separate sub-problem, meaning that only data from the same cell is used to calculate the parameter values within that cell. Because only parts of the data are considered, problems with parameter unidentifiability are exaggerated in STS. In contrast, a related approach to data analysis has been developed for the studies of patient-to-patient variations. This approach, called nonlinear mixed-effects modelling (NLME), makes use of all data, when estimating the patient-specific parameters. NLME would therefore be advantageous compared to STS also for the study of cell-to-cell variation. However, no such systematic evaluation of the two approaches exists. Results: Herein, such a systematic comparison between STS and NLME has been performed. Different examples, both linear and nonlinear, and both simulated and real experimental data, have been examined. With informative data, there is no significant difference in the results for either parameter or noise estimation. However, when data becomes uninformative, NLME is significantly superior to STS. These results hold independently of whether the loss of information is due to a low signal-to-noise ratio, too few data points, or a bad input signal. The improvement is shown to come from both the consideration of a joint likelihood (JLH) function, describing all parameters and data, and from an a priori postulated form of the population parameters. Finally, we provide a small tutorial that shows how to use NLME for single-cell analysis, using the free and user-friendly software Monolix. Conclusions: When considering uninformative single-cell data, NLME yields more accurate parameter and noise estimates, compared to more traditional approaches, such as STS and JLH.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 9, 52
Keyword [en]
Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling, NLME, Single cell modelling, Singe cell analysis, FRAP
National Category
Biomedical Laboratory Science/Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-263432DOI: 10.1186/s12918-015-0203-xISI: 000360678700002PubMedID: 26335227OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-263432DiVA: diva2:859530
Funder
Swedish Research Council
Available from: 2015-10-07 Created: 2015-09-30 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3166 kB)147 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3166 kBChecksum SHA-512
07b4f9d139f13d0126843dc6da831f8d49b059bf3217b841167f2b461a93e98186fdfd2bf796c0d3a5cdd45a90b300e924a43329c5c198390b499742888bc261
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Kjellsson, Maria C.
By organisation
Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences
In the same journal
BMC Systems Biology
Biomedical Laboratory Science/Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 147 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 578 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf