Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients: a randomized controlled trial sub-study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine. (Research Unit Östersund)
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine. (Research Unit Östersund)
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine. (Research Unit Östersund)
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Medicine. (Resarch Unit Östersund)
2015 (English)In: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, ISSN 1471-2261, E-ISSN 1471-2261, Vol. 15, 125Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Enhanced cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up is needed to improve adherence to recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and blood pressure (BP) levels. Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high risk of recurrent events. Secondary prevention is therefore essential in these patients.

Methods: Patients with acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack were randomized to nurse-based telephone follow-up (intervention) or usual care (control). LDL-C and BP were measured at 1 month (baseline) and 12 months post-discharge. Intervention patients with above-target values at baseline received medication titration to achieve treatment goals. Values measured for control patients were given to the patient’s general practitioner for assessment.

Results: The final analyses included 225 intervention and 215 control patients with DM or CKD. Among patients with above-target baseline values, the following 12-month values were recorded for intervention and control patients, respectively: LDL-C, 2.2 versus 3.0 mmol/L (p < 0.001); and median systolic BP (SBP), 140 versus 145 mmHg (p = 0.26). Among patients with above-target values at baseline, 52.3% of intervention patients reached target LDL-C values at 12 months versus 21.3% of control patients (absolute difference of 30.9%, 95% CI 16.1 to 43.8%), and there was a non-significant trend of more intervention patients reaching target SBP (49.4% versus 36.8%; absolute difference of 12.6%, 95% CI -1.7 to 26.2%).

Conclusions: Cardiovascular secondary prevention with nurse-based telephone follow-up was more effective than usual care in improving LDL-C levels 12 months after discharge for patients with DM or CKD. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central, 2015. Vol. 15, 125
Keyword [en]
acute coronary syndrome, myocardial infarction, stroke, transient ischemic attack, diabetes mellitus, chronic renal insufficiency, secondary prevention, cardiovascular disease
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-109784DOI: 10.1186/s12872-015-0115-0ISI: 000363367500003PubMedID: 26466804OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-109784DiVA: diva2:859171
Note

8 sidor

Available from: 2015-10-06 Created: 2015-10-06 Last updated: 2017-12-01Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Cardiovascular disease and diabetes or renal insufficiency: the risk of ischemic stroke and risk factor intervention
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Cardiovascular disease and diabetes or renal insufficiency: the risk of ischemic stroke and risk factor intervention
2015 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Background

In patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) or chronic kidney disease (CKD), established cardiovascular disease (CVD) is associated with an increased risk of recurrent events and poor outcome. Ischemic stroke after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is a devastating event that carries high risks of decreased patient independence and death. Among patients with DM or CKD, the risk of an ischemic stroke within a year following an AMI is not known. Improved risk factor control is required to reduce the likelihood of CVD recurrence. Guidelines recommend target lipid profile and blood pressure values; however, data show that these targets are often not met. Therefore, there remains an urgent need for improved cardiovascular secondary preventive follow- up.

Aims

The aims of the present studies were to define trends in the incidence and predictors of ischemic stroke after an AMI in patients with DM or CKD. Furthermore to assess whether secondary preventive follow-up with nurse-based telephone follow-up including medication titration after CVD improves risk factor values in patients with DM or CKD and to investigate if this method performs better than usual care to implement a new treatment guideline in diabetic patients.

Methods

To assess the risk of post-AMI ischemic stroke, patient data were obtained from the Swedish Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive Care Admissions (RIKS-HIA). In separate studies, we compared a total of 173 233 AMI patients with and without DM, and 118 434 AMI patients with and without CKD.

Within the nurse-based age-independent intervention to limit evolution of disease (NAILED) trial, we investigated a nurse-based cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up protocol. Patients with acute coronary syndrome, stroke, or transient ischemic attack were randomized to receive either nurse-based telephone follow-up (intervention) or usual care (control). Low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) levels and blood pressure (BP) were measured at 1 month (baseline) and 12 months post- discharge. Intervention patients with above-target baseline values received medication titration to achieve treatment goals, while the measurements for control patients were forwarded to their general practitioners for assessment. We calculated the changes in LDL-C level and BP between baseline and 12 months post-discharge, and compared 

these changes between 225 intervention patients and 215 control patients with concurrent DM or CKD. During the course of the NAILED trial, new secondary preventive guidelines for DM patients were released, including a new LDL-C target value. To assess adherence to the new guidelines within the NAILED trial, we compared LDL-C levels in the 101 intervention patients and 100 control patients with DM.

Results

Ischemic stroke after AMI

The rates of ischemic stroke within one-year after admission for an AMI decreased over time, from 7.1% in 1998–2000 to 4.7% in 2007–2008 among DM patients, and from 4.2% to 3.7% during the same time periods for non-diabetic patients. Lower stroke risk was associated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and initiation of secondary preventive treatments in-hospital.

In-hospital ischemic stroke occurred in 2.3% of CKD patients and 1.2% of non-CKD patients, with no change in these incidences over time. The rates of one-year post- discharge ischemic stroke decreased between 2003–2004 and 2009–2010 from 4.1% to 2.5% among CKD patients, and from 2.0% to 1.3% among non-CKD patients. Lower rates of post-discharge stroke were associated with PCI and statins.

Cardiovascular secondary preventive follow-up

Among DM and CKD patients with above-target baseline values in the NAILED trial, the median LDL-C value at 12 months was 2.2 versus 3.0 mmol/L (p<0.001) and median systolic BP was 140 versus 145 mmHg (p=0.26) for intervention and control patients, respectively.

Before the guideline change, 96% of the intervention and 70% of the control patients reached the target LDL-C value (p<0.001). After the guideline change, the corresponding respective proportions were 65% and 36% (p<0.001).

Conclusion

Ischemic stroke is a fairly common post-AMI complication among patients with DM and CKD. This risk of stroke has decreased during recent years, possibly due to the increased use of evidence-based therapies. Compared with usual care, cardiovascular secondary prevention including nurse-based telephone follow-up improved LDL-C values at 12 months after discharge in patients with DM or CVD, and led to more efficient implementation of new secondary preventive guidelines. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet, 2015. 55 p.
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 1743
Keyword
cardiovascular disease, secondary prevention, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, acute coronary syndrome, stroke, randomized control trial
National Category
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems
Research subject
Medicine, cardiovascular disease
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-109785 (URN)978-91-7601-320-5 (ISBN)
Public defence
2015-11-06, Hörsalen, Östersunds sjukhus, Östersund, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-10-16 Created: 2015-10-06 Last updated: 2015-10-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Cardiovascular secondary prevention in high-risk patients(1422 kB)57 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1422 kBChecksum SHA-512
8a2230ef94d6348cadcc00a80022f06721864c5fc0217a841438aa0d964c2a41eafe6ec4fdc8a9adfed40dd096b47a2eff65d6d4ada6b7d238094d7051a94ffb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
Additional file 1: Risk factor values for patients who had target values at baseline(117 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 117 kBChecksum SHA-512
a098e8ee832434a60bd85a03db3fcba149851f6d235847610185eabd8e687011879efd2df86de35aa91033e6d3a8cc93b2a39da40620154af7eea17dae22fe8f
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf
Additional file 2: Risk factor values for DM patients who had above-target values at baseline(125 kB)5 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT01.pdfFile size 125 kBChecksum SHA-512
6ce54658e7261054bc50b75d8b7caf37ff92efd7cd2686bc3ab19295dbecc20d25488a9b14f7399073d972312f9b5b0a4014909010d749fe7d579de4f4d66516
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf
Additional file 3: Risk factor values for CKD patients who had above-target values at baseline(120 kB)2 downloads
File information
File name ATTACHMENT02.pdfFile size 120 kBChecksum SHA-512
5bdbbfb79fb8c6f50554087a5ba2f4a2f515259e7a9b9920f8331fa6be06a80662042dfe15850e7d953580297c3b777055effce44915dbfa08da93139104bd76
Type attachmentMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jakobsson, StinaIrewall, Anna-LottaBjörklund, FredrikMooe, Thomas
By organisation
Medicine
In the same journal
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Cardiac and Cardiovascular Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 60 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf