Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Polarisation in Political Twitter Conversations
University of Borås, Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT. (Social media studies)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0659-4754
2014 (English)In: Aslib Journal of Information Management, ISSN 2050-3806, Vol. 66, no 3, 329-341 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to describe and analyse relationships and communication between Twitter actors in Swedish political conversations. More specifically, the paper aims to identify the most prominent actors, among these actors identify the sub-groups of actors with similar political affiliations, and describe and analyse the relationships and communication between these sub-groups.

Design/methodology/approach: Data were collected during four weeks in September 2012, using Twitter API. The material included 77,436 tweets from 10,294 Twitter actors containing the hashtag #svpol. In total, 916 prominent actors were identified and categorised according to the main political blocks, using information from their profiles. Social network analysis was utilised to map the relationships and the communication between these actors.

Findings: There was a marked dominance of the three main political blocks among the 916 most prominent actors: left block, centre-right block, and right-wing block. The results from the social network analysis suggest that while polarisation exists in both followership and re-tweet networks, actors follow and re-tweet actors from other groups. The mention network did not show any signs of polarisation. The blocks differed from each other with the right-wingers being tighter and far more active, but also more distant from the others in the followership network.

Originality/value: While a few papers have studied political polarisation on Twitter, this is the first to study the phenomenon using followership data, mention data, and re-tweet data.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2014. Vol. 66, no 3, 329-341 p.
Keyword [en]
Twitter, Social network analysis, Sweden, Polarization, Political debate
National Category
Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-833DOI: 10.1108/AJIM-09-2013-0086OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hb-833DiVA: diva2:857948
Available from: 2015-09-30 Created: 2015-09-30 Last updated: 2016-09-06Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Following Tweets Around: Informetric methodology for the Twittersphere
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Following Tweets Around: Informetric methodology for the Twittersphere
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The purpose of this thesis is to critically discuss methods to collect and analyse data related to the interaction and content on the social platform Twitter. The thesis contains examples of how networked communication can be studied on Twitter, based on the affordances of the platform considering interaction with interfaces and other users. The foundational problem is that social science Twitter research has been based on easily accessible data without introducing or discussing criteria for collecting appropriate samples for a given research task.The thesis builds on one literature review and four studies of political Twitter communication. The analyses are based on a view of the Twitter platform as a non-neutral filtering gatekeeper. On the one hand, Twitter treats content and users asymmetrically, by emphasising the popular. On the other hand, Twitter determines what data are available and how data can be accessed through the API (application programming interface). How Twitter provides access to the data in turn affects the analyses the researcher does. The central problem of the thesis is that researchers do not know what relevant data are not collected. Data collection based on keywords, hashtags or users creates data sets that contain fragments of conversations. To solve the problem, a new method was developed. By combining the hashtag and user-based methods, replies to collected tweets were stored, regardless if they contained a tracked hashtag or not.The four studies this thesis builds on show a complexity of collecting and analysing Twitter data. A key finding is that conversations beyond the hashtag can be quite extensive. As a consequence of this, communication networks based on hashtagged replies were found to be potentially very different from networks based on replies from a more complete data set, where non-hashtagged replies are also included. A network based on hashtagged communication is thus misleading compared to a complete communication network.Apart from that it is not entirely trivial to identify the parameters to define what should be studied; tests of the API showed that complete data sets cannot be obtained. Therefore, it is important to reflect on both the data collected and the data excluded, not only as a result of the sampling criteria but also what is not given access to. It is also important to be clear about the affordances for interaction that exist when the study is made, both in the user interface but also what API allows and permits.This research contributes with knowledge about how Twitter is used in the context being studied, but the main contribution is methodological. With the method developed, collection of more complete data sets is enabled, as is analysis of the conversations that take place on the platform. This results in more accurate measurements of the activity. Based on the results of this thesis, there are reasons to suspect that previous studies could differ in terms of results such as communication network size and shape, as well as the type of users that emerges as prominent in the material, compared to if replies that do not contain the studied hashtag had been collected.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Borås: Högskolan i Borås, 2016. 151 p.
Series
Skrifter från Valfrid, ISSN 1103-6990 ; 61
National Category
Information Studies
Research subject
Library and Information Science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-9339 (URN)978-91-981653-0-2 (ISBN)978-91-981653-1-9 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-10-03, C203, Allégatan 1, Borås, 13:00
Note

Due to copyright, the articles included in this PhD thesis are not available in the digital version of the thesis. Find links to the published articles in the list of papers below.

The article: Lorentzen, D. G. (manuscript). Is it all about politics? A hashtag analysis of the activities of the Swedish political Twitter elite. Is not yet submitted to a journal and is only found in the printed version.

Available from: 2016-09-06 Created: 2016-03-09 Last updated: 2017-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(660 kB)98 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 660 kBChecksum SHA-512
113cf5b0a66f7fa78d001e741a7968f832018278b1aa70d0e4f2e6f2789cdd71321760274203966ed4fb981d457ee16dc0eb284cb92aac1d189bc45c5bcde04d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf
fulltext(520 kB)232 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 520 kBChecksum SHA-512
4ade8e9693f8bb59fac5ba02c3762573c02af20b2cd687bb841ae3f9bfc6d1d307d1c2247b8d3436b40acf2e5e61653dbe689420bdf128187a8f814b6b2bd335
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textThis article is (c) Emerald Group Publishing and permission has been granted for this version to appear here. Emerald does not grant permission for this article to be further copied/distributed or hosted elsewhere without the express permission from Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Lorentzen, David
By organisation
Faculty of Librarianship, Information, Education and IT
Computer and Information Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 330 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 182 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf