Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Acceptability of home-assessment post medical abortion and medical abortion in a low-resource setting in Rajasthan, India: Secondary outcome analysis of a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial
Uppsala Universitet.
Karolinska institutet; ARTH, India.
Karolinska institutet.
Karolinska institutet.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: PLoS ONE, ISSN 1932-6203, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 10, no 9, e0133354Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Studies evaluating acceptability of simplified follow-up after medical abortion have focused on high-resource or urban settings where telephones, road connections, and modes of transport are available and where women have formal education.

Objective: To investigate women's acceptability of home-assessment of abortion and whether acceptability of medical abortion differs by in-clinic or home-assessment of abortion outcome in a low-resource setting in India.

Design: Secondary outcome of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Setting Outpatient primary health care clinics in rural and urban Rajasthan, India.

Population: Women were eligible if they sought abortion with a gestation up to 9 weeks, lived within defined study area and agreed to follow-up. Women were ineligible if they had known contraindications to medical abortion, haemoglobin < 85mg/l and were below 18 years.

Methods: Abortion outcome assessment through routine clinic follow-up by a doctor was compared with home-assessment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test and a pictorial instruction sheet. A computerized random number generator generated the randomisation sequence (1: 1) in blocks of six. Research assistants randomly allocated eligible women who opted for medical abortion (mifepristone and misoprostol), using opaque sealed envelopes. Blinding during outcome assessment was not possible.

Main outcome measures: Women's acceptability of home-assessment was measured as future preference of follow-up. Overall satisfaction, expectations, and comparison with previous abortion experiences were compared between study groups.

Results: 731 women were randomized to the clinic follow-up group (n = 353) or home-assessment group (n = 378). 623 (85%) women were successfully followed up, of those 597 (96%) were satisfied and 592 (95%) found the abortion better or as expected, with no difference between study groups. The majority, 355 (57%) women, preferred home-assessment in the event of a future abortion. Significantly more women, 284 (82%), in the home-assessment group preferred home-assessment in the future, as compared with 188 (70%) of women in the clinic follow-up group, who preferred clinic follow-up in the future (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Home-assessment is highly acceptable among women in low-resource, and rural, settings. The choice to follow-up an early medical abortion according to women's preference should be offered to foster women's reproductive autonomy.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 10, no 9, e0133354
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-19527DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133354ISI: 000360437700006PubMedID: 26327217OAI: diva2:856595
Available from: 2015-09-24 Created: 2015-09-24 Last updated: 2016-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(596 kB)30 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 596 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Klingberg-Allvin, Marie
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 30 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 323 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link