Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Conceptions of decision-making capacity in psychiatry: interviews with Swedish psychiatrists
Harvard University, MA 02163 USA; Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Linköping University, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Health Care Analysis. Linköping University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences. University of Coll Boras, Sweden.
Karolinska Institute, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: BMC Medical Ethics, ISSN 1472-6939, E-ISSN 1472-6939, Vol. 16, no 34Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Decision-making capacity is a key concept in contemporary healthcare ethics. Previous research has mainly focused on philosophical, conceptual issues or on evaluation of different tools for assessing patients capacity. The aim of the present study is to investigate how the concept and its normative role are understood in Swedish psychiatric care. Of special interest for present purposes are the relationships between decisional capacity and psychiatric disorders and between health law and practical ethics. Methods: Eight in-depth interviews were conducted with Swedish psychiatrists. The interviews were analysed according to descriptive qualitative content analysis in which categories and sub-categories were distilled from the material. Results: Decision-making capacity was seen as dependent on understanding, insight, evaluation, reasoning, and abilities related to making and communicating a choice. However, also the actual content of the decision was held as relevant. There was an ambivalence regarding the relationship between psychiatric disorders and capacity and a tendency to regard psychiatric patients who made unwise treatment decisions as decisionally incapable. However, in cases relating to patients with somatic illnesses, the assumption was rather that patients who made unwise decisions were imprudent but yet decisionally capable. Conclusions: The respondents conceptions of decision-making capacity were mainly in line with standard theories. However, the idea that capacity also includes aspects relating to the content of the decision clearly deviates from the standard view. The tendency to regard imprudent choices by psychiatric patients as betokening lack of decision-making capacity differs from the view taken of such choices in somatic care. This difference merits further investigations.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central , 2015. Vol. 16, no 34
Keyword [en]
Psychiatry; Bioethics; Mental capacity; Personal autonomy; Paternalism; Involuntary commitment
National Category
Clinical Medicine
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-121148DOI: 10.1186/s12910-015-0026-8ISI: 000359415200001PubMedID: 25990948OAI: diva2:852245

Funding Agencies|Swedish Research Council [437-2014-299]; Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2014-4024]; Swedish Society of Medicine

Available from: 2015-09-08 Created: 2015-09-08 Last updated: 2017-12-04

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(450 kB)