Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Local perceptions of causes of death in rural South Africa: a comparison of perceived and verbal autopsy causes of death
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Epidemiology and Global Health. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. INDEPTH Network, Accra, Ghana; Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa; Medical Research Council, Johannesburg, South Africa; Wits University Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Research Unit (Agincourt), School of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Show others and affiliations
2015 (English)In: Global Health Action, ISSN 1654-9716, E-ISSN 1654-9880, Vol. 8, p. 1-9, article id 28302Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Understanding how lay people perceive the causes of mortality and their associated risk factors is important for public health. In resource-limited settings, where verbal autopsy (VA) is used as the most expedient method of determining cause of death, it is important to understand how pre-existing concepts of cause of death among VA-informants may influence their VA-responses and the consequential impact on cause of death assessment. This study describes the agreement between VA-derived causes of death and informant-perceived causes and associated influential factors, which also reflects lay health literacy in this setting. Method: Using 20 years of VA data (n = 11,228) from the Agincourt Health and Demographic Surveillance System (HDSS) site in rural South Africa, we explored the agreement between the causes of death perceived by the VA-informants and those assigned by the automated Inter-VA tool. Kappa statistics and concordance correlation coefficients were applied to measure agreement at individual and population levels, respectively. Multivariable regression models were used to explore factors associated with recognised lay perceptions of causes of mortality. Results: Agreement between informant-perceived and VA-derived causes of death at the individual level was limited, but varied substantially by cause of death. However, agreement at the population level, comparing cause-specific mortality fractions was higher, with the notable exception of bewitchment as a cause. More recent deaths, those in adults aged 15-49 years, deaths outside the home, and those associated with external causes showed higher concordance with InterVA. Conclusion: Overall, informant perception of causes of death was limited, but depended on informant characteristics and causes of death, and to some extent involved non-biomedical constructs. Understanding discordance between perceived and recognised causes of death is important for public health planning; low community understanding of causes of death may be detrimental to public health. These findings also illustrate the importance of using rigorous and standardised VA methods rather than relying on informants' reported causes of death.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Taylor & Francis, 2015. Vol. 8, p. 1-9, article id 28302
Keywords [en]
community perception, causes of death, verbal autopsy
National Category
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-107183DOI: 10.3402/gha.v8.28302ISI: 000358180600001PubMedID: 26193897OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-107183DiVA, id: diva2:850419
Funder
Wellcome trust, 058893/Z/99/AWellcome trust, 069683/Z/02/ZWellcome trust, 085477/Z/08/ZAvailable from: 2015-09-01 Created: 2015-08-19 Last updated: 2019-03-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(557 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 557 kBChecksum SHA-512
c6838f824410a7bef473835c28f5646f9aa5c32b0bef399d120911809bca37df356a1bbfe5ac22d992bcd82cac3cdc96dcb0a5e4637385f061eebbeb3e644eda
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fottrell, EdwardKahn, KathleenByass, Peter
By organisation
Epidemiology and Global HealthDepartment of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
Global Health Action
Public Health, Global Health, Social Medicine and Epidemiology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 41 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 250 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf