Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Using bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling to examine global and specific factors in measures of sports coaches’ interpersonal styles
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. (IHsport)
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Psychology. Faculty of Health, Research Institute for Sport and Exercise, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT, Australia.
2015 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, ISSN 1664-1078, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 6, 1303Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the present work we investigated distinct sources of construct-relevant psychometric multidimensionality in two sport-specific measures of coaches’ need-supportive (ISS-C) and controlling interpersonal (CCBS) styles. A recently proposed bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) framework was employed to achieve this aim. In Study 1, using a sample of floorball players, the results indicated that the ISS-C can be considered as a unidimensional measure, with one global factor explaining most of the variance in the items. In Study 2, using a sample of male ice hockey players, the results indicated that the items in the CCBS are represented by both a general factor and specific factors, but the subscales differ with regard to the amount of variance in the items accounted for by the general and specific factors. These results add further insight into the psychometric properties of these two measures and the dimensionality of these two constructs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 6, 1303
Keyword [en]
Controlling behaviors, Dimensionality, Leadership, Need support, Self-report scales
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-107023DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01303ISI: 000360530500002OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-107023DiVA: diva2:846460
Funder
Swedish National Centre for Research in Sports, P2014-0043
Available from: 2015-08-17 Created: 2015-08-17 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Sports coaches’ interpersonal motivating styles: longitudinal associations, change, and multidimensionality
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Sports coaches’ interpersonal motivating styles: longitudinal associations, change, and multidimensionality
2016 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Ett motiverande ledarskap : multidimensionalitet och longitudinella samband med idrottares motivation och välbefinnande
Abstract [en]

Coaches play a central role in shaping the sport environment for young athletes. This thesis is focused on the leadership process in sports and how coaches’ autonomy-supportive and controlling interpersonal styles longitudinally are related to young athletes’ motivation and ill- and well-being. The aim is also to examine psychometric multidimensionality in measures of coaches’ need-supportive and controlling interpersonal styles. Questionnaire data from young athletes were used in the empirical studies. In Study 1, we examined an adaptive motivational process (i.e., longitudinal associations between autonomy support, need satisfaction, self-determined motivation, and well-being). The results showed that within-person changes in perceived autonomy support, need satisfaction, self-determined motivation, and well-being were all positively correlated. Higher self-determined motivation and well-being early in the season longitudinally predicted higher levels of perceived autonomy support from the coach. Higher self-determined motivation was also a positive predictor of within-person changes in perceived autonomy support and well-being over the season. In Study 2, we examined a maladaptive motivational process (i.e., longitudinal associations between coaches’ controlling behaviors, controlled motivation, and ill-being). The findings demonstrated that athletes who perceived their coach as more controlling reported higher controlled motivation at the end of the season and that higher controlled motivation early in the season predicted higher ill-being at the end of the season. Controlled motivation was also a positive predictor of athletes’ perceptions of coaches’ controlling behaviors at the within-person level. Study 1 and 2 suggest that individual factors (e.g., motivation and well-being) seemed to function as important determinants of how athletes perceived their coach and future research should explore the underlying mechanisms through which these processes occur. In Study 3, we examined psychometric multidimensionality in measures of athletes’ perceptions of coaches’ need-supportive (Interpersonal Supportiveness Scale-Coach [ISS-C]) and controlling (Controlling Coach Behaviors Scale [CCBS]) interpersonal styles. The analyses indicated that the ISS-C is not multidimensional; it appears to comprise a single factor. Three of the four subscales of the CCBS appear to share a common core, whereas the fourth subscale (i.e., controlling use of rewards) seems to represent a slightly different aspect of a controlling interpersonal style. These results bring into question the multidimensionality in measures of athletes’ perceptions of coaches’ interpersonal styles. Neither measure displayed a coherent multidimensional pattern, indicating a need for better alignment between theory and measurement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2016. 105 p.
Keyword
athletes, change, leadership, motivation, multidimensionality, psychological health, self-determination theory, sports, structural equation modeling
National Category
Applied Psychology
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-126380 (URN)978-91-7601-565-0 (ISBN)
Public defence
2016-10-28, Hörsal F, Humanisthuset, Umeå, 13:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2016-10-06 Created: 2016-10-03 Last updated: 2017-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2235 kB)65 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2235 kBChecksum SHA-512
7687c63b6a309d714575e51e293a78d538baaccf8614c7a22a7aaec8b0b5068c1ae6cbe14e84694c4bba57a636c3b09430f96380fd0d4ece7dced2a2900a8665
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stenling, AndreasHassmén, Peter
By organisation
Department of Psychology
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Applied Psychology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 65 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 95 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf