Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Medborgardialogens verktyg: En experimentell studie om att förmedla detaljplaner med 2D- och 4D-information
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
University of Gävle, Faculty of Engineering and Sustainable Development, Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [sv]

För att skapa en så bra livsmiljö som möjligt spelar medborgardeltagandet en stor roll i den urbana planeringen. För att gemene man ska kunna se framtida konsekvenser av nya planförslag måste de också förstå planens innehåll. Det finns olika slags verktyg för att presentera dessa planförslag. Syftet med denna studie var att genom ett experiment jämföra hur deltagarna förstod detaljplanematerial som presenterades på två olika sätt. Målet var att komma fram till hur olika presentationsverktyg kunde underlätta förmedlingen av nya planförslag vid medborgardialoger. Experimentets upplägg omfattade två moment: 2D-metoden och 4D- metoden. I 2D-metoden fanns detaljplanehandlingar som använts under Södertäljes samråd om Kvarteret Orion. I 4D-metoden tillämpades en 4D-modell över Södertälje som har använts vid medborgardialog. För att samla rådata tillämpades enkäter som insamlingsmetod. Enkätfrågorna utformades för att undersöka deltagarnas förmåga att förstå spatial och instruktiv information. Deltagarna delades slumpmässigt in i två grupper där respektive grupp fick prova en behandling: behandling A eller behandling B. Resultatet analyserades med hjälp av ett Wilcoxon signed rank test och en kvalitativ stapeldiagramsanalys. Slutsatsen visade att 4D- metoden förmedlade informationen tydligast, men att 2D- och 4D-metoderna har olika egenskaper. Dessa metoder behöver därför kompletteras med varandra för att förmedla detaljplaneinformationen till medborgaren på bästa möjliga sätt.

Abstract [en]

To create a good living environment the civic participation plays a major role in urban planning. In order for the common man to be able to see the future implications of the new planning proposal they must also understand the plan’s content. There are various tools to present these planning proposals. The purpose of this study was to through an experiment compare how the participants understood the zoning plan presented to them in two different ways. The aim was to come up with how various presentation tools could facilitate the communication of planning proposals for citizen dialogues. The experiment set-up comprised two parts: the 2D method and 4D method. In the 2D method, information and planning documents from the Södertälje consultation of Kvarteret Orion were used. In the 4D method, a 4D model of Kvarteret Orion previously used for citizen dialogue was employed. To collect raw data, questionnaires were applied as a collection method. The survey questions were designed to examine the participants’ ability to understand spatial and instructional information. The participants in the experiment were divided randomly into two groups, with each group assigned to try one of two treatments: treatment A or treatment B. The results were analyzed by a Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and a bar graph qualitative analysis. The conclusion was that the 4D method was the most efficient in communicating the information, but that both methods have their different strengths. To fully convey zoning planning information to the citizen, both methods need to be used since only when complementing each other do they present a full picture of the plan at hand.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 37+bilagor p.
Keyword [en]
2D information, 4D information, zoning plan, experiments, citizen dialogue, public participation
Keyword [sv]
2D-information, 4D-information, detaljplan, experiment, medborgardialog
National Category
Other Civil Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-20105OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hig-20105DiVA: diva2:846362
External cooperation
4Dialog AB
Subject / course
Spatial planning
Educational program
Study Programme in Spatial Planning
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-08-20 Created: 2015-08-16 Last updated: 2015-10-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Medborgardialogens verktyg(16205 kB)118 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 16205 kBChecksum SHA-512
25be4b9b4dfa54ec2c5a4626a3ddcfb5f3bb2a269f4a2a08fd1756876cb68a0f301fb1e0e48e85ce98f64da6a07aa82eb0869516f278662fc6b7e80424d2b1a4
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, CarolineNygren, Emilia
By organisation
Department of Industrial Development, IT and Land Management
Other Civil Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 118 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 628 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf