Masshantering av schaktmassor: en jämförelse mellan traditionell masshantering och GPS-styrd masshantering i realtid
Independent thesis Basic level (professional degree), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
The purpose of this report is to analyze the advantages of using programme software to monitor masshauling instead of using the conventional method. A comparsion between different programs will also be conducted in an attempt to determine the most affordable. This report is written for NCC Construction AB to help them choose a software most fitting for future projects.The report is based upon literature such as information taken from the developers website, existing reports with similar context, interviews with sellers of the software and interviews with people working in the building sector.The result of this report shows that there are several advantages with investing in a software that helps the management of a project and that it is something that should be taken under consideration instead of the existing method. Topcon is a clear favorite following the inquiries comparisons as done, when they deliver a complete system and not only a supplement to the current approach. Scanlaser are just in the beginning of its development, and is so far only out with an early version of the software, while Topcon has been brought further in development and therefore has more features in the program. To utilize Topcon we fully recommend that the device HT-30 is used.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 52 p.
GPS, GNSS, masshantering, Sitelink 3D, iCon Telematics, Earthmover, Hauler
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-257417ISRN: UTH-INGUTB-EX-B-2015/29-SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-257417DiVA: diva2:839274
NCC Construction Sverige AB
Bachelor Programme in Construction Engineering
Caroline, Öhman, Biträdande universitetslektorBjurhager, Ingela, Biträdande lektor