Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
When Product Managers Gamble with Requirements: Attitudes to Value and Risk
Responsible organisation
2009 (English)Conference paper (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Context and motivation: Finding a balance between commercial (customer specific, market pull and external quality requirements) and internal quality requirements is a recognized challenge in market driven software product development (MDSPD). In order to address this challenge it is important to understand the preferences and biases influencing decision makers selecting requirements for software releases. Question/problem: Prospect theory has been successfully applied to many disciplines. Applying it to MDSPD suggests decision makers will avoid risk when selecting between commercial requirements, take risk with internal quality requirements, and prefer commercial requirements over internal quality requirements in order to maximize their perceived value. This paper seeks to investigate this claim. Principal ideas/results: This paper presents an experiment investigating whether the biases proposed by prospect theory can be seen operating in MDSPD requirements engineering (RE). The results indicate risk avoidance when dealing commercial requirements, while greater risk is taken when dealing with internal quality requirements. Contribution: As this is the first paper to use prospect theory to explain requirements selection decisions, it presents opportunity to educate people in the biases they bring to the RE process, and facilitate the creation of strategies for balancing the different requirements types.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Springer , 2009.
Keyword [en]
requirements selection, prospect theory, value, risk
National Category
Software Engineering Business Administration
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7950DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-02050-6ISI: 000267695800001Local ID: 978-3-642-02049-0OAI: diva2:835631
15th International Working Conference on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (RefsQ)
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2009-09-15 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(277 kB)26 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 277 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hederstierna, Anders
Software EngineeringBusiness Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 26 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 51 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link