Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
On the Relationship between Different Size Measures in the Software Life Cycle
Responsible organisation
2009 (English)Conference paper, Published paper (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Various measures and methods have been developed to measure the sizes of different software entities produced throughout the software life cycle. Understanding the nature of the relationship between the sizes of these products has become significant due to various reasons. One major reason is the ability to predict the size of the later phase products by using the sizes of early life cycle products. For example, we need to predict the Source Lines of Code (SLOC) from Function Points (FP) since SLOC is being used as the main input for most of the estimation models when this measure is not available yet. SLOC/FP ratios have been used by the industry for such purposes even though the assumed linear relationship has not been validated yet. Similarly, FP has recently started to be used to predict the Bytes of code for estimating the amount of spare memory needed in systems. In this paper, we aim to investigate further the nature of the relationship between the software functional size and the code size by conducting a series of empirical studies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Penang, Malaysia: IEEE Computer Society , 2009.
Keyword [en]
Software Size, Functional Size, Source Lines of Code, Function Points, Bytes of Code, IFPUG, COSMIC, ISBSG
National Category
Software Engineering
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7916DOI: ISBN 978-0-7695-3909-6ISI: 000275317200003Local ID: diva2:835589
16th Asia Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2010-01-09 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(316 kB)