Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Evaluating the effectiveness of impact assessment instruments: Theorising the nature and implications of their political constitution
Responsible organisation
2010 (English)In: Environmental impact assessment review, ISSN 0195-9255, E-ISSN 1873-6432, Vol. 30, no 6, 371-379 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The central role of impact assessment instruments globally in policy integration initiatives has been cemented in recent years. Associated with this trend, but also reflecting political emphasis on greater accountability in certain policy sectors and a renewed focus on economic competitiveness in Western countries, demand has increased for evidence that these instruments are effective (however defined). Resurgent interest in evaluation has not, however, been accompanied by the conceptual developments required to redress longstanding theoretical problems associated with such activities. In order to sharpen effectiveness evaluation theory for impact assessment instruments this article critically examines the neglected issue of their political constitution. Analytical examples are used to concretely explore the nature and significance of the politicisation of impact assessment. It is argued that raising awareness about the political character of impact assessment instruments, in itself, is a vital step in advancing effectiveness evaluation theory. Broader theoretical lessons on the framing of evaluation research are also drawn from the political analysis. We conclude that, at least within the contemporary research context, learning derived from analysing the meaning and implications of plural interpretations of effectiveness represents the most constructive strategy for advancing impact assessment and policy integration theory.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2010. Vol. 30, no 6, 371-379 p.
Keyword [en]
Impact assessment, Policy integration, Effectiveness, Evaluation research, Political analysis, Power
National Category
Environmental Analysis and Construction Information Technology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7770DOI: 10.1016/j.eiar.2010.01.004ISI: 000282851800005Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoD5979799442193BDC1257758004605BCOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-7770DiVA: diva2:835432
Available from: 2012-09-18 Created: 2010-07-06 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(157 kB)320 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 157 kBChecksum SHA-512
fa79cadb5653447e2c5b0e5bb8b02210b172c4d4d7a3a6b18ca8628e290dd051eee655ed0493fcd1ba181c07c54c92b63aa18b6d05d0050436fe0392b348dc4c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Emmelin, Lars
In the same journal
Environmental impact assessment review
Environmental Analysis and Construction Information Technology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 320 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 139 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf