Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Practice Selection Framework
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2012 (English)In: International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, ISSN 0218-1940 , Vol. 22, no 1, 17-58 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Knowledge management (KM) in software engineering and software process improvement (SPI) are challenging. Most existing KM and SPI frameworks are too expensive to deploy or do not take an organization’s specific needs or knowledge into consideration. There is thus a need for scalable improvement approaches that leverage knowledge already residing in the organizations. This paper presents the Practice Selection Framework (PSF), an Experience Factory approach, enabling lightweight experience capture and use by utilizing postmortem reviews. Experiences gathered concern performance and applicability of practices used in the organization, gained from concluded projects. Project managers use these as decision support for selecting practices to use in future projects, enabling explicit knowledge transfer across projects and the development organization as a whole. Process managers use the experiences to determine if there is potential for improvement of practices used in the organization. This framework was developed and subsequently validated in industry to get feedback on usability and usefulness from practitioners. The validation consisted of tailoring and testing the framework using real data from the organization and comparing it to current practices used in the organization to ensure that the approach meets industry needs. The results from the validation are encouraging and the participants’ assessment of PSF and particularly the tailoring developed was positive.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
World Scientific Publishing Company , 2012. Vol. 22, no 1, 17-58 p.
Keyword [en]
Total Quality Management, TSF, Project Management, Quality Management, Process Assessment and Improvement, SPI
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-7181DOI: 10.1142/S0218194012500027ISI: 000303207500002Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfo33228D55D772A14DC125780D003938BBOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-7181DiVA: diva2:834763
Available from: 2012-11-27 Created: 2011-01-03 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1806 kB)121 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1806 kBChecksum SHA-512
ff3a41a8b51840e5c7ac4fb585976073e8c25a911f9fc40995b8b99ede54c90fbfdddadacf18bd90f82e1112bda61d6f029408c0bbe3073c3fba11b96e179563
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gorschek, Tony
By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 121 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf