Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Uni-REPM: a framework for requirements engineering process assessment
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2015 (English)In: Requirements Engineering, ISSN 0947-3602, E-ISSN 1432-010X, Vol. 20, no 1, 91-118 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

It has been shown that potential business benefits could be achieved by assessing and improving the requirements engineering (RE) process. However, process assessment models such as CMMI and ISO9000 only cover RE shallowly. Tailored models such as REGPG and REPM, on the other hand, do not cover market-driven requirements engineering. Other attempts such as MDREPM covers market-driven requirements engineering, but correspondingly neglects bespoke requirements engineering. Moreover, the area itself has evolved so practices that once were cutting edge are now commonplace. In this article, we develop and evaluate a unified requirements engineering process maturity model (Uni-REPM) that can be used in a market-driven as well as a bespoke context. This model is based on REPM, but has evolved to reflect contemporary requirements engineering practices. Uni-REPM is primarily created based on a systematic literature review of market-driven requirements engineering practices and a literature review of bespoke practices. Based on the results, Uni-REPM is formulated. The objective of Uni-REPM is twofold. Firstly, it is expected to be applicable for assessing the maturity of RE processes in various scenarios where an organisation would use different development approaches. Secondly, it instructs practitioners about which RE practices to perform and their expected benefits. As an assessment instrument, Uni-REPM provides a simple and low-cost solution for practitioners to identify the status of their RE process. As a guidance tool, Uni-REPM lessens the gap between theoretical and practical worlds by transferring the available RE technologies from research to industry practice.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer , 2015. Vol. 20, no 1, 91-118 p.
Keyword [en]
Process assessment, Process improvement, Requirements engineering, Requirements engineering practices
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-6317DOI: 10.1007/s00766-013-0188-1ISI: 000350309300005Local ID: oai:bth.se:forskinfoE1559AC7C828E594C1257C2E0034A574OAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-6317DiVA: diva2:833814
Available from: 2015-05-26 Created: 2013-11-25 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(880 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 880 kBChecksum SHA-512
e6f3ca0c5c097d3a64be0c2b604acbc008e0549d631941a08dc8e615d56e780154577b466a819a57cd01df35f971c3e3345a020fda35ce39c5ebbbe06970aed5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Svahnberg, MikaelGorschek, TonyNguyen, Thi Than LoanNguyen, Mai Huong
By organisation
School of Computing
In the same journal
Requirements Engineering
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 125 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 186 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf