Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Identification and Analysis of Combined Quality Assurance Approaches
Blekinge Institute of Technology, School of Computing.
2010 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years))Student thesis
Abstract [en]

Context: Due to the increasing size and complexity of software today, the amount of effort for software quality assurance (QA) is growing and getting more and more expensive. There are many techniques lead to the improvement in software QA. Static analysis can obtain very good coverage while analyze program without execution, but it has the weakness of imprecision by false errors. In contrast, dynamic analysis can obtain only partial coverage due to a large number of possible test cases, but the reported errors are more precise. Static and dynamic analyses can complement each other by providing valuable information that would be missed by using isolated analysis technique. Although many studies investigate the QA approaches that combine static and dynamic QA techniques, it is unclear what we have learned from these studies, because no systematic synthesis exists to date. Method: This thesis is intended to provide basic key concepts for combined QA approaches. A major part of this thesis presents the systematic review that brings details discussion about state of the art on the approaches that combine static and dynamic QA techniques. The systematic review is aimed at the identification of the existed combined QA approaches, how to classify them, their purposes and input as well as introduce which combination is available. Result: The results show that, there are two relations in the combination of static and dynamic techniques such as integration and separation. Besides, the objectives of combined QA approaches were introduced according to QA process quality and product quality. The most common inputs for combined approaches were also discussed. Moreover, we identified which combination of static and dynamic techniques should or should not be used as well as the potential combination for further research.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2010. , 90 p.
Keyword [en]
Quality assurance, Static analysis, Dynamic analysis, Testing, Inspection, Systematic review
National Category
Software Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:bth-4007Local ID: oai:bth.se:arkivex48E42F29EE111B43C12577F5003C9FFAOAI: oai:DiVA.org:bth-4007DiVA: diva2:831325
Uppsok
Technology
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-04-22 Created: 2010-12-10 Last updated: 2015-06-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1087 kB)157 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1087 kBChecksum SHA-512
8cffb0f0828e09e55e7c83dfb45bc2ee0506b94ca349bee5d700276051633281388216c8223d12af0664b763b7cb62e366ab803e06daed72d0b3d2e3c237dda2
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Computing
Software Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 157 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 48 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf