Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How should Nederman adjust their sustainability reporting as a consequence of the new EU-directive?
Mid Sweden University, Faculty of Science, Technology and Media, Department of Engineering and Sustainable Development.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

By incorporating sustainability on all levels in an organization, it signals to customers, stakeholders and others that are affected by the company’s actions that they are taking actions towards a more sustainable business on all levels. There are several benefits from doing so, the organization can identify areas that need improvement, and highlight areas that are ahead in their sustainability work.

 

In 2017 all companies within the European Union that have 500 employees or more have to report on sustainability according to the new EU directive (2014/95/EU). Today Nederman has a report covering their sustainability work, however, it does not meet the requirements of the new EU directive. This report is a part of the preparatory work that has to be completed before being able to form a sustainability report according to the new directive.

 

A benchmarking of six companies, of which three are competitors was done as well as a GAP analysis, weighing Nederman’s current key objectives with the new indicators.

 

The result shows that Nederman’s existing Key Performance Indicators are relevant but are not enough to meet criterias of the new EU-directive. Several new indicators are suggested regarding energy use, CO2 emissions, water use, recycling and Transport. The GAP analysis showed a clear increase in quality in the reports reporting according to GRI and following UN Global Compact. By adapting to the suggested indicators as well as doing Integrated reporting, a higher level of sustainability reporting can be reached. There are strengths and weaknesses with all ways of measuring data and the potential of measuring errors or using not very useful unit is always present. What is most interesting is the development over time since that can be measured in percent and trends can be seen.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 28 p.
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-25278OAI: oai:DiVA.org:miun-25278DiVA: diva2:826682
External cooperation
Nederman AB
Subject / course
Environmental Engineering MM1
Educational program
Ecotechnology NEKOG 180 higher education credits
Presentation
2015-06-01, Östersund, 13:50 (English)
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-06-29 Created: 2015-06-25 Last updated: 2015-06-29

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(543 kB)174 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 543 kBChecksum SHA-512
961f7651b4012f0e2034753d1c782020e083e030fba036918dd67c683739663f2e0d7ed91194cb9cc73328a270347c3d87c65c69f8af12b271b88ac69226d8fb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Engineering and Sustainable Development
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 174 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 305 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf