Infelicitous cancellation: The explicit cancellability test for conversational implicature revisited
2015 (English)In: Australasian Journal of Philosophy, ISSN 0004-8402, E-ISSN 1471-6828, Vol. 93, no 3, 465-474 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
This paper questions the adequacy of the explicit cancellability test for conversational implicature as it is commonly understood. The standard way of understanding this test relies on two assumptions: first, that that one can test whether a certain content is (merely) conversationally implicated, by checking whether that content is cancellable, and second, that a cancellation is successful only if it results in a felicitous utterance. While I accept the first of these assumptions, I reject the second one. I argue that a cancellation can succeed even if it results in an infelicitous utterance, and that unless we take this possibility into account we run the risk of misdiagnosing philosophically significant cases.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. Vol. 93, no 3, 465-474 p.
implicature, cancellability, pragmatics, felicity, Grice
Research subject Philosophy; Theoretical Philosophy
IdentifiersURN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-118632DOI: 10.1080/00048402.2014.988738OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-118632DiVA: diva2:825867
ProjectsMental States and Utterance Content
FunderEuropean Science Foundation (ESF), Eurocores Scheme 10-EuroUnderstanding-FP-033 (project CCCOM)Swedish Research Council, 435-2010-454Swedish Research Council, 421-2010-1542EU, FP7, Seventh Framework Programme, 229 441-CCC