Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Concept of Disciplinary Affordance
Uppsala University. (Physics Education Research)ORCID iD: 0000-0003-3244-2586
Uppsala University. (Physics Education Research)
Uppsala University. (Physics Education Research)
Uppsala University. (Physics Education Research)
2014 (English)In: The 5th International 360 Conference. Encompassing the multimodality of knowledge, May 8-10 2014, Aarhus University, Denmark, 2014, 20- p.Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Since its introduction by Gibson (1979) the concept of affordance has been discussed at length by a number of researchers. Most famous, perhaps is the disagreement between Gibson and Norman (1988) about whether affordances are inherent properties of objects or are only present when perceived by an organism. More recently, affordance has been drawn on in the educational arena, particularly with respect to multimodality (see Linder (2013) for a recent example). Here, Kress et al (2001) claim that different modes have different specialized affordances.

In this theoretical paper the concept of disciplinary affordance (Fredlund et al., 2012) is suggested as a useful analytical educational tool. The concept makes a radical break with the views of both Gibson and Norman in that rather than focusing on the perception of an individual, it focuses on the disciplinary community as a whole. Put simply, the disciplinary affordances of a given semiotic resource are determined by the functions that it is expected to fulfil for the discipline. As such, the question of whether these affordances are inherent or perceived becomes moot. Rather, the issue is what a semiotic resource affords to an individual and whether this matches the disciplinary affordance. The power of the term is that learning can now be framed as coming to perceive the disciplinary affordances of semiotic resources.

In this paper we will discuss the history of the term affordance, define the term disciplinary affordance and illustrate its usefulness in a number of educational settings.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. 20- p.
Keyword [en]
Disciplinary affordance, learning, semiotics, science education
National Category
Didactics
Research subject
Humanities
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-44421OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-44421DiVA: diva2:821992
Conference
The 5th International 360 Conference. Encompassing the multimodality of knowledge, May 8-10 2014, Aarhus University, Denmark
Available from: 2015-06-16 Created: 2015-06-15 Last updated: 2016-05-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Presentation(824 kB)70 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 824 kBChecksum SHA-512
9d52e6813f7f34e32a5fb8d8ca8d576f189843ea8ee12e04aee50ffbe565aa6a2f012564b8fcdf12422d193ea6570f866e9c4dd328b3906901e78bf97b43b24a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Airey, John
Didactics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 70 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 176 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf