Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Naturhänsyn vid föryngringsavverkningar: En jämförelse mellan certifierade och o-certifierade hyggen
Linnaeus University, Faculty of Technology, Department of Forestry and Wood Technology.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesisAlternative title
Nature conservation in regeneration fellings : A comparison between certified and non-certified forest clearings (English)
Abstract [en]

A growing number of Swedish forest owners are choosing to certify their forestry. However, there appears to be a lack of field surveys which describe differences between certified and non-certified forests concerning the degree of completed environmental considerations. In order to know to what extent certified forests contribute towards improved environmental consideration, we need studies on how large the difference is in relation to non-certified forests.

Differences between certified and non-certified forest clearings were quantified through an inventory of the number of retention trees, dead trees and snags. The result showed that the retained number of the investigated parameters varied greatly between individual clearings, regardless of certification status. However, the results suggested that the certified clearings had an average higher incidence ofthe investigated parameters. In comparison to statistics of southern Sweden's average, the results also suggested that the certified clearings (from the county “Blekinge”) most of the time had a higher incidence of the investigated parameters, while the non-certified clearings most of the time had a lower incidence of the investigated parameters. The environmental considerations on neither the certified nor the non-certified clearings were found to be near the highest amount that could be required by the Swedish forestry act. This observation is interesting, especially since the certified clearings would be expected to maintain a consistently high level in relation to the law requirement.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , p. 24
Keywords [en]
Nature conservation, Regeneration felling, Forest Certification, FSC, PEFC, Retention trees, Dead trees, Snags
Keywords [sv]
Naturhänsyn, Föryngringsavverkning, Skogscertifiering, Polytax, Toleransnivån, FSC, PEFC, Hänsynsträd, Torrträd, Högstubbar
National Category
Forest Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-44497OAI: oai:DiVA.org:lnu-44497DiVA, id: diva2:821798
Subject / course
Skogs- och träteknik
Educational program
Forest Production and Wood utilization Programme, 180 credits
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-06-17 Created: 2015-06-15 Last updated: 2015-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(489 kB)139 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 489 kBChecksum SHA-512
2db0e02c27052f2096adcbf50c9754f863ea38e065e7a8603f925a201e9e5d522489b5d91a29c7cdbb87c678f94a312f421919bfa6654f6baaea8bda5765f1cd
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rylander, Anna
By organisation
Department of Forestry and Wood Technology
Forest Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 139 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 168 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf