Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Betyg och bedömning: En studie kring hur högstadielärare i samhällskunskap arbetar med betyg och bedömning enligt Lgr 11
Jönköping University, School of Education and Communication.
2015 (Swedish)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This paper aims to investigate how secondary school teachers of social studies working on grading and assessment in relation to Lgr 11. The paper will be based on three issues, and will be explored through interviews with five-working teachers. The existing boundaries and the essay outline and key concepts presented. Then follow the theoretical extensions selected. These are adapted along the topic selection. In the essay Background treated earlier school reforms and curriculum basic structure. Even the new role of the teacher and the school's general counsel issued. The method used in this study is a qualitative approach in the form of interviews. This is criticized and its reliability and validity are presented. The thesis of results dealing with the five different teachers and their answers to the questions asked. This is discussed and analyzed and linked than once to the theories previously selected. The result shows that the selected secondary school teachers to society of knowledge experiencing difficulties in interpreting the curriculum, its central content and knowledge requirements. The curriculum ambition of contributing to interpretations that may vary between teachers and this leads to an unequal assessment and grading. The study also shows that the selected teachers believe that the key to a fair and equal assessment is that teachers work together to design rubrics and other tools for both them and their students.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 44 p.
Keyword [sv]
betyg bedömning Lgr11
National Category
Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hj:diva-27043ISRN: JU-HLK-JU-2-20150029OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hj-27043DiVA: diva2:818662
Subject / course
HLK, Social Studies
Supervisors
Available from: 2015-06-10 Created: 2015-06-09 Last updated: 2015-06-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(513 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 513 kBChecksum SHA-512
f1fba17c98f1f069d501f8b0bb7409b952838dfd6ae52488ce791fd88fa3afc30d4e00f2905ae97dab36f508bc6a81eb2497b419356fa393eff6452372663254
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Education and Communication
Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 125 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 243 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf