Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Scheduling of Maglev Elevators: Simulating multiple elevator cars in a two shaft system.
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC).
KTH, School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC).
2015 (English)Independent thesis Basic level (degree of Bachelor), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Elevator systems have been quite similar for more than a hundred years and it has only quite recently become more feasible to have elevators being able to switch shafts allowing the construction of a system with more than two elevator cars in a single shaft. Such a system is to be constructed and tested during 2016 and functions using magnetic levitation technology. This new system calls for new algorithms to schedule the assignment of the passengers’ calls.

Different strategies based on the collective control algorithm were developed to schedule the maglev system. The strategies were tested in a simulation of a twenty-five floor building and compared to a traditional system of one elevator car per shaft using the collective control scheduling strategy. The results show that in two out of the three scenarios simulated the maglev system performs better than the traditional system when average waiting time and average traveling time are compared. The traditional system beats the maglev system by a lot under the interfloor traffic scenario and adding more elevator cars improved the maglev systems performance but not enough to be as good as the tradition system.

The conclusions drawn are that it is hard to schedule the maglev system to spread the cars out. It is also clear that the maglev system requires more elevator cars or improved scheduling to perform as well as the traditional system during the interfloor traffic scenario but is performing equally well or better during the up and down-peak scenarios. Further simulations are required to confirm these conclusions as the schedulers used are quite simple.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015.
National Category
Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-166725OAI: oai:DiVA.org:kth-166725DiVA: diva2:812001
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-05-15 Created: 2015-05-14 Last updated: 2015-05-15Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(742 kB)194 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 742 kBChecksum SHA-512
dcf65fd4fc0da3ab5b33f92865f875e9ddd8f6669876c72628dbd7997e11716eb0859c7ccd5c09cd44c0892f0627417275ae752bab4a3233979a69666d661755
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
School of Computer Science and Communication (CSC)
Computer Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 194 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 125 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf