Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Capabilities and Civil Disobedience: A comparative analysis of The Capability Approach
Linköping University, Department of Culture and Communication. Linköping University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

This essay investigates whether Amartya Sen’s or Martha Nussbaum’s version of the capability approach is better suited to justify civil disobedience. The theoretical framework of my study is critical discourse analysis. This aims to establish the most significant conditions for the justification of civil disobedience. An interpretation of the conception of civil disobedience is presented. The investigation assumes that civil disobedience is justified when people advocate for a change in a policy or a law that limits the securing of basic capabilities. A major part of the essay is devoted to clarifying how the idea of basic capabilities relates to civil disobedience. I also emphasize the importance of human dignity as a universal value. I argue that this value is crucial to realizing why some capabilities are more basic than others. I show that Nussbaum is in a better position than Sen to explain when civil disobedience can be justified. This is because Sen lacks a framework of basic capabilities leaving it up to each nation to assess which capabilities ought to be secured.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 31 p.
Keyword [en]
capability approach, civil disobedience, basic capabilities, human rights, human dignity, positive liberty
National Category
Philosophy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-117885ISRN: LIU-IKK/PF-A-15/001—SEOAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-117885DiVA: diva2:811678
Subject / course
Philosophy
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2015-05-13 Created: 2015-05-12 Last updated: 2015-05-13Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(479 kB)202 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 479 kBChecksum SHA-512
78f85122db0fc59f275f6d181cfc76d44330a8f2257472127194ac97ed874eafa682c1eface674b3e7a1733d0e62a48c1d899f6abe1c498d0d06d286095125b9
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Culture and CommunicationFaculty of Arts and Sciences
Philosophy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 202 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 478 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf