Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Modelling atmospheric structure, cloud and their response to CCN in the central Arctic: ASCOS case studies
Show others and affiliations
2012 (English)In: Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics, ISSN 1680-7316, E-ISSN 1680-7324, Vol. 12, no 7, 3419-3435 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Observations made during late summer in the central Arctic Ocean, as part of the Arctic Summer Cloud Ocean Study (ASCOS), are used to evaluate cloud and vertical temperature structure in the Met Office Unified Model (MetUM). The observation period can be split into 5 regimes; the first two regimes had a large number of frontal systems, which were associated with deep cloud. During the remainder of the campaign a layer of low-level cloud occurred, typical of central Arctic summer conditions, along with two periods of greatly reduced cloud cover. The short-range operational NWP forecasts could not accurately reproduce the observed variations in near-surface temperature. A major source of this error was found to be the temperature-dependant surface albedo parameterisation scheme. The model reproduced the low-level cloud layer, though it was too thin, too shallow, and in a boundary-layer that was too frequently well-mixed. The model was also unable to reproduce the observed periods of reduced cloud cover, which were associated with very low cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) concentrations (< 1 cm(-3)). As with most global NWP models, the MetUM does not have a prognostic aerosol/cloud scheme but uses a constant CCN concentration of 100 cm(-3) over all marine environments. It is therefore unable to represent the low CCN number concentrations and the rapid variations in concentration frequently observed in the central Arctic during late summer. Experiments with a single-column model configuration of the MetUM show that reducing model CCN number concentrations to observed values reduces the amount of cloud, increases the near-surface stability, and improves the representation of both the surface radiation fluxes and the surface temperature. The model is shown to be sensitive to CCN only when number concentrations are less than 10-20 cm(-3).

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2012. Vol. 12, no 7, 3419-3435 p.
National Category
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences
Research subject
Remote sensing
URN: urn:nbn:se:smhi:diva-483DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-3419-2012ISI: 000302806700018OAI: diva2:805244
Available from: 2015-04-15 Created: 2015-04-14 Last updated: 2016-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1250 kB)10 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1250 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sedlar, Joseph
By organisation
Atmospheric remote sensing
In the same journal
Atmospheric Chemistry And Physics
Meteorology and Atmospheric Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 10 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 27 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link