Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Three Patterns of Power in Technology-Enabled Contention
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.
2014 (English)In: Mobilization, ISSN 1086-671X, E-ISSN 1938-1514, Vol. 19, no 4, 421-439 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Technology-enabled networks of contention differ from physically co-present networks in that communication more saliently structures relations among actors. Technology platforms may even take on some roles of organizations in providing information, distributing resources, and coordinating action. Although many observers claim that online networks tend to concentrate public displays of attention and recognition in power-law hierarchies, we propose that technology-enabled contentious networks may seek or avoid concentrated hierarchies as reflections of the participants' underlying values and technology preferences. The article identifies three ideal type power signatures in technology-enabled networks-highly concentrated, moderately concentrated, and dispersed. Different power signatures can result in similar political outcomes, suggesting that none of them represents a generally more effective way to organize power in networks. However, in particular situations, different power configurations can affect how action is framed, how individuals become engaged, and the degree of fit between mobilizations and political contexts.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 19, no 4, 421-439 p.
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-113970ISI: 000347634400005OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-113970DiVA: diva2:789808
Note

AuthorCount:2;

Available from: 2015-02-20 Created: 2015-02-16 Last updated: 2017-12-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(776 kB)98 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 776 kBChecksum SHA-512
0846e5e5d93d7cdc6e648dc19e6d492425d320f6829866dab7d17319ef54e7b550664351a117dccda1b86e7300fe9ad0c9f80fa6603d9ac029c44ee859a401c1
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Segerberg, Alexandra
By organisation
Department of Political Science
In the same journal
Mobilization
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 98 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 434 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf