Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Akademiska omdömen under osäkerhet: en studie av kollektiva ankringseffekter i Vetenskapsrådets beredningsgrupper
Stockholm University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE).
2015 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

The main focus of this study concerns the existence of anchoring effects in the peer review process of research proposals. According to the psychological theory of anchoring effects, once an anchor (represented by a number) is set, other judgments are made by adjusting away from the anchor, and there is a common human tendency toward interpreting other information around the anchor. This effect is commonly seen as a general flaw in human judgment, a cognitive bias that stems from a specific heuristic that guides people when they involve their intuition in order to solve a problem. In the following study, this cognitive bias will be analysed from a sociological point of view, that is, as a collective phenomenon rather than an individual one. It will also be applied to a new empirical case, the peer review process of research proposals. The anchoring effects have here been investigated using a meeting ethnographic approach. The evidence comes from direct observations of ten panel groups at the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet). The analysis suggest that collective anchoring effects emerge as a result of the combination of the evaluation techniques that are being used (grading scales and middle ranking) and the efforts of the evaluators to reach consensus. The author suggests that what many commentators and evaluators have earlier interpreted as a certain proportion of chance in the peer review process, might instead be better understood as anchoring effects.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE), Stockholm University , 2015. , 24 p.
Series
SCORE rapportserie, ISSN 1404-5052 ; 2015:1
National Category
Public Administration Studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-113584ISBN: 978-91-89658-84-4 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:su-113584DiVA: diva2:786008
Available from: 2015-02-04 Created: 2015-02-04 Last updated: 2015-08-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(296 kB)63 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 296 kBChecksum SHA-512
3c33ceca7e5370aaf7ca2708f4a8e4d47209d324e8859a13c23ad59d4452ebf271ffcd88908949d3c6e070ad8045c3c4febff5e31496baba4a3e5b551802ddde
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Roumbanis, Lambros
By organisation
Stockholm Centre for Organizational Research (SCORE)
Public Administration Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 63 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 138 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf