Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Logics and ambivalence: professional dilemmas during implementation of an inclusive education practice
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Education.
2015 (English)In: Education Inquiry, ISSN 2000-4508, E-ISSN 2000-4508, Vol. 6, no 1, 53-71 p., 26157Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Although inclusion has been a value set forth in international policy arenas and a focus for school development, research indicates there are problems in establishing more inclusive practices. Teachers may favor an inclusive model of education but often experience difficulty implementing inclusive practices. The aim of this article was to analyze teachers’ experiences during the implementation of a top-down-initiated inclusive practice in a municipality in northern Sweden. The empirical data is based on qualitative interviews with four teachers, two from a special school and two from a compulsory school. The results show professional ambivalence in relation to introduction and information, cooperation and views on inclusion. The results are analyzed from an institutional theoretical approach and show that two institutional logics are apparent. One is educational logic, which is formal/ideological and contains norms and values connected to ideological ideals such as normality, equality, and inclusion. The other is social logic, which is not informal but vague and pragmatic; differentiation and disability are key aspects. Consequently, important inter-professional aspects of the implementation process, such as information, cooperation, and views on inclusion, were characterized by ambivalence. To conclude, the article adds to the discussion of the challenges—administrative, organizational, and practical—in implementing new discursive practices within inclusive education such as norms and values, routines, and rituals, which are not easily changed, regardless of political rhetoric.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Co-action news , 2015. Vol. 6, no 1, 53-71 p., 26157
Keyword [en]
professional ambivalence, cooperation, intellectual disabilities, institutional logics, inclusive education
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
Education
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-98695DOI: 10.3402/edui.v6.26157OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-98695DiVA: diva2:783690
Available from: 2015-01-27 Created: 2015-01-27 Last updated: 2017-12-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(283 kB)125 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 283 kBChecksum SHA-512
e6ca1a6abc9cd391d377428d9d6276a563abb13dc0efd48a3a94e4c5b08e18f81730d6668e74e49a78dd852bbfc8ca3915715590fb08fa7bd292ae30a17e2d6c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ineland, Jens
By organisation
Department of Education
In the same journal
Education Inquiry
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 125 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 536 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf