Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Multistakeholder Governance and Nodal Authority – Understanding Internet Exchange Points
European University Viadrina.
Uppsala University, Disciplinary Domain of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts, Department of Philosophy.
2015 (English)Report (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This case study considers Internet exchange points (IXPs) as an example of governance processes in action. Internet exchange points are the points of connection between different Internet networks, which enable different networks to exchange traffic at a shared facility without cost to either party through a process known as “peering”. Three different IXP governance models representing large and influential IXPs are compared: the DE-CIX in Frankfurt, CAIX in Cairo, and KIXP in Nairobi. DE-CIX, the largest IXP in the world, is a subsidiary of the German Internet trade association eco, and is thus “owned” by the Internet industry in Germany. Though well functioning, this has meant that key stakeholder groups such as civil society, and the academic and technical communities are excluded from participating in discussions over policy decisions. In contrast, the Cairo Internet Exchange Point (CAIX) is run by a public authority, the Egyptian Ministry of Communications and Information Technology. Though it is governed by a broad set of stakeholders including private sector, government, and civil society representatives, its decision-making processes are somewhat opaque. Lastly, KIXP was founded by a Kenyan network engineer and is governed by a local trade association. While set up with multistakeholder coordination under the leadership of the private sector, its dayto-day operations and governance fall under private sector control. By tracing out the plurality of models used for IXP governance and comparing the processes of developing peering relationships, this case provides unique lessons for the governance process, particularly surrounding trade-offs between inclusiveness and effectiveness.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 14 p.
Series
NoC Internet Governance Case Studies Series
Keyword [en]
Internet governance - multistakeholder - IXPs - Internet Exchange Points - governance -
National Category
Philosophy Ethics Communication Systems Other Electrical Engineering, Electronic Engineering, Information Engineering Law (excluding Law and Society) Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalization Studies) Computer and Information Science
Research subject
Practical Philosophy; Jurisprudence; Information Systems; Computer Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-242341OAI: oai:DiVA.org:uu-242341DiVA: diva2:783243
Projects
Global Network of Interdisciplinary Internet & Society Research Centers (NoC). Facilitated by the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University
Available from: 2015-01-25 Created: 2015-01-25 Last updated: 2015-01-27Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA