Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
A systematic review of biomechanical factors in runners before, during and after Iliotibial Band Syndrome
Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences, GIH, Department of Sport and Health Sciences.
2015 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (One Year)), 10 credits / 15 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]


The aim of this study was to define functional tests, and to describe kinematic and kinetic factors as well as muscular function, and to study any differences in these parameters, found in the literature, between runners before developing, during and after recovering from ITBS compared to healthy controls.


A systematic literature review was performed in Cinahl, EMBASE, PEDro, PubMed and Swemed + with the search terms: "Iliotibial band syndrome", "Iliotibial band friction syndrome" and "Iliotibial tract syndrome". Thirteen articles were accepted for inclusion in this review. They were divided into three groups: "before ITBS", "during ITBS" and "after ITBS". To assess individual quality of the included studies the author of this review formed a protocol with support of the STROBE statement checklist which assists in writing observational studies.


Functional tests: none of the included studies, assessed functional tests in subjects before development of ITBS, during ITBS or after recovering from ITBS.

Kinematic variables: in the literature, several kinematic variables were described in relation to ITBS. Peak eversion at the rear foot was not significantly different between ITBS groups and control groups before, during and after ITBS. Peak knee flexion did not differ between ITBS groups and control groups during and after ITBS. Peak hip adduction was significantly greater in the ITBS group before development of ITBS compared to a control group. During ITBS there were significantly lower peak adduction values both in a fresh state and after a run to exertion, compared to control groups. After recovering from ITBS there were contradictory results concerning the adduction angle at the hip between groups.

Kinetic variables: According to the included studies, peak inversion moment at the rear foot did not differ between the ITBS group and a control group, before developing ITBS. After recovering from ITBS, the subjects had significantly greater inversion moments at the rear foot compared to a control group. Peak abduction moment did not differ between ITBS groups and control groups before and after ITBS.

Muscular function: In the included studies, these factors were only tested in subjects with ITBS. Therefore this question could not be answered in the present study.


Subjects with ITBS are likely to be more abducted at the hip during running, before ITBS onset, compared to healthy controls. This could possibly represent a compensation mechanism.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2015. , 47 p.
Examensarbete, 2014:83
National Category
Medical and Health Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:gih:diva-3716OAI: diva2:782089
Educational program
Magisterprogrammet i idrottsvetenskap med inriktning mot idrottsmedicin
Available from: 2015-01-20 Created: 2015-01-19 Last updated: 2015-01-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(589 kB)303 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 589 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Sport and Health Sciences
Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 303 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 285 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link