Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Empirical investigation of barriers and drivers to the adoption of energy conservation measures, energy management practices and energy services in the Swedish iron and steel industry
University of Stuttgart, Germany.
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Energy Systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0360-6019
Linköping University, Department of Management and Engineering, Energy Systems. Linköping University, The Institute of Technology.
2014 (English)In: Journal of Cleaner Production, ISSN 0959-6526, E-ISSN 1879-1786, Vol. 84, 509-525 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The Swedish iron and steel industry is focused on the production of advanced steel grades and accounts for about 5% of the countrys final energy consumption. Energy efficiency is according to the European Commission a key element for the transition towards a resource-efficient economy. We investigated four aspects that are associated with the adoption of cost-effective energy conservation measures: barriers, drivers, energy management practices and energy services. We used questionnaires and follow-up telephone interviews to collect data from members of the Swedish steel association. The heterogeneous observations implied a classification into steel producers and downstream actors. For testing the significance, the Mann Whitney U test was used. The most important barriers were internal economic and behavioural barriers. Energy service companies, in particular third-party financing, played a minor role. In contrast, high importance was attached to energy management as the most important drivers originated from within the company. Energy management practices showed that steel companies are actively engaged in the topic, but need to raise its prioritisation and awareness within the organisation. When sound energy management practices are included, the participants assessed the cost-effective energy conservation potential to be 9.7%, which was 2.4% higher than the potential for solely adopting cost-effective technologies.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier , 2014. Vol. 84, 509-525 p.
Keyword [en]
Industrial energy efficiency; Barriers; Drivers; Energy management; ESCOs; Iron and steel
National Category
Mechanical Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-113183DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.078ISI: 000345731000053OAI: oai:DiVA.org:liu-113183DiVA: diva2:779995
Available from: 2015-01-13 Created: 2015-01-12 Last updated: 2017-12-05

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(988 kB)242 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 988 kBChecksum SHA-512
8e094a10558a749b38def98ea627505c63f413f60b0e3fd5078f458be8cfc138c8b252e21073098aa3e9322a4205a2ffbfd3db94280624dd7bf93775608ae997
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johansson, MariaThollander, Patrik
By organisation
Energy SystemsThe Institute of Technology
In the same journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
Mechanical Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 242 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 300 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf