Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Local politico-administrative perspectives on quality improvement based on national registry data in Sweden: a qualitative study using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research.
Dalarna University, School of Education, Health and Social Studies, Caring Science/Nursing. Uppsala universitet.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7737-169X
Show others and affiliations
2014 (English)In: Implementation Science, ISSN 1748-5908, E-ISSN 1748-5908, Vol. 9, 189Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background. Through a national policy agreement, over 167 million Euros will be invested in the Swedish National Quality Registries (NQRs) between 2012 and 2016. One of the policy agreement¿s intentions is to increase the use of NQR data for quality improvement (QI). However, the evidence is fragmented as to how the use of medical registries and the like lead to quality improvement, and little is known about non-clinical use. The aim was therefore to investigate the perspectives of Swedish politicians and administrators on quality improvement based on national registry data.

Methods. Politicians and administrators from four county councils were interviewed. A qualitative content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) was performed.

Results. The politicians and administrators perspectives on the use of NQR data for quality improvement were mainly assigned to three of the five CFIR domains. In the domain of intervention characteristics, data reliability and access in reasonable time were not considered entirely satisfactory, making it difficult for the politico-administrative leaderships to initiate, monitor, and support timely QI efforts. Still, politicians and administrators trusted the idea of using the NQRs as a base for quality improvement. In the domain of inner setting, the organizational structures were not sufficiently developed to utilize the advantages of the NQRs, and readiness for implementation appeared to be inadequate for two reasons. Firstly, the resources for data analysis and quality improvement were not considered sufficient at politico-administrative or clinical level. Secondly, deficiencies in leadership engagement at multiple levels were described and there was a lack of consensus on the politicians¿ role and level of involvement. Regarding the domain of outer setting, there was a lack of communication and cooperation between the county councils and the national NQR organizations.

Conclusions. The Swedish experiences show that a government-supported national system of well-funded, well-managed, and reputable national quality registries needs favorable local politico-administrative conditions to be used for quality improvement; such conditions are not yet in place according to local politicians and administrators.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. Vol. 9, 189
Keyword [en]
Quality registry; Clinical database; Clinical registry; Implementation; Quality improvement; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
National Category
Health Sciences
Research subject
Health and Welfare
URN: urn:nbn:se:du-16655DOI: 10.1186/s13012-014-0189-6ISI: 000348545500001PubMedID: 25544124OAI: diva2:778632
Available from: 2015-01-11 Created: 2015-01-11 Last updated: 2016-05-31Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(562 kB)18 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 562 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMed

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eldh, Ann CatrineWallin, Lars
By organisation
Caring Science/Nursing
In the same journal
Implementation Science
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 35 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Altmetric score

Total: 467 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link