Change search
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Comparison of risk assessment methods for polluted soils in Sweden, Norway and Denmark
Stockholm University, Faculty of Science, Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology.
2014 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

Land contamination is an acknowledged problem around the world due to its potentially adverse impacts on human health and the environment. Specifically in Europe there are estimated to be 2,500,000 potentially contaminated sites. The risk that contaminated sites pose is investigated by risk assessments. The methods and the models though used in risk assessments, vary both on a national and an international level.

In this study, the risk assessment methods and models for polluted soils used in Scandinavia and issued by the Environmental Protection Agencies were compared. The comparison aimed to (i) identify similarities and differences in the risk assessment methodology and risk assessment methods and to (ii) investigate to which extend these differences can impact the results of the models and the implications regarding mitigation measures.

The method and model comparison showed that Sweden and Norway have great similarities in assessing risks for contaminated soil. However, there are differences with Denmark on a conceptual level. When a common hypothetical petrol station with 20 soil samples was assessed, the results and the conclusions of the three risk assessments were quite different; the site was seen as posing risk to human health with the Danish model when complied with the quality criteria issued by the Norwegian model. The Swedish risk assessment concluded that the contaminant concentration in 3 out of 20 samples was potentially harmful for the environment but not for human health.

The demonstrated divergence of the conclusions of risk assessments has major implications and shows great interest for mainly four groups: Land-owners who may be called to cover the expenses for remedial action. Consultants and companies who perform risk assessments and land remediation. The countries that have to meet national and international environmental goals and can also share/ or cover the cost for remedial action. The people exposed to such environments that could be deemed as potentially harmful by a neighboring country.

The study was conducted in collaboration with URS Nordic.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2014. , 65 p.
Keyword [en]
Risk assessment models, polluted soils, ecological risk, petrol station, Miljødirektoratet, Miljøstyrelsen, Naturvårdsverket, Environmental Protection Agencies
National Category
Environmental Sciences
URN: urn:nbn:se:su:diva-109376OAI: diva2:764650
External cooperation
URS Nordic AB
2014-10-27, U27, 23:28 (English)
Available from: 2014-11-21 Created: 2014-11-19 Last updated: 2014-11-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2013 kB)159 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2013 kBChecksum SHA-512
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

By organisation
Department of Physical Geography and Quaternary Geology
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 159 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

Total: 502 hits
ReferencesLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link